TODAY: Peggy Nash answers your questions at 3pm PST, 6pm EST

63 posts / 0 new
Last post
MegB
TODAY: Peggy Nash answers your questions at 3pm PST, 6pm EST

NDP Leadership candidate Peggy Nash will be dropping by babble today, March 2nd, at 3pm PST/6pm EST to answer your questions on her quest for the leadership of the Official Opposition.

Potential interview questions have already been submitted here and here, and a shortlist of those submissions has been assembled by the editorial staff of rabble.ca. Each selected question will be posed by a moderator and then Peggy will offer her response. Once Peggy has responded to the initial question, babblers are welcome to offer comments and follow-up questions in this thread, as time allows.

For an idea of how this session will run, see our previous Q&A with Paul Dewar.

Unlike other threads on babble, abusive posts will be deleted immediately. Due to time constraints some questions may go unposted and unanswered.

Come back at 3pm PST/6pm EST to see what Peggy Nash has to say!

 

Issues Pages: 
MegB

In about 10 minutes, Peggy will be here to answer your questions!

MegB

Good evening babblers. Please join me in welcoming Peggy Nash, NDP leadership candidate and MP for the Parkdale/High Park riding in Toronto. Welcome to babble Peggy!

Howard

Welcome Peggy Smile

MegB

First question is from Howard:

 

What is your view on international trade? Can you give an example of a trade deal you could imagine signing as Prime Minister and an existing trade relationship you could see yourself expanding?

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Great thanks! Glad to be here. Looking forward to your questions.

1springgarden

Hi Peggy, great to have you join us!

Unionist

Greetings Sister!

 

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Thanks for your question Howard. I support international trade. I don't think there is a future for our economy without strong international trade, but it has to be balanced trade. The problem I have with the way it's being conducted in Canada is that the latest generation of trade and investment treaties deal with matters far beyond international trade, affecting access to medicines, environmental regulation, industrial policy, natural resource management and the future of public services.  

These broad agreements restrict the role of the state in regulating the activities of international corporations.  Through binding a broad range of government measures, they limit or even foreclose key options for more progressive governance.  This is true across a wide range of matters, often only peripherally related to trade. Chapter 11 style provisions that allow companies to sue governments undermine the democratic will.

Treaty negotiations now deal primarily with regulatory and other so-called “non-tariff barriers” to trade.   Sensitive decisions restricting democratic authority over vital regulatory matters should not be made in secret negotiations where only corporate lobby groups have privileged access.

I don't think there are any perfect examples of a trade agreements that I would or would not sign as Prime Minister. As I outlined above, my main criteria to judge will be whether or not the agreement goes too far beyond the scope of actual trade mechanisms and limits the capacity of government to make decisions in the best interests of Canadians in a number of domestic policy areas.

In terms of existing trade relationships that I could see myself wanting to expand, I would have to say that I would like to re-engage Canada in multilateral systems (including at the WTO) to find innovative ways to enhance global commerce while ensuring working people share in the benefits of trade and the environment is protected.

MegB

Our next question is from Shartal (via email):

I would like to ask what Ms. Nash's anti poverty program includes.

 

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Glad to see you on here Howard, 1springgarden and Unionist! And everyibe else reading.


Howard

Thanks Peggy.

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Thanks for your question.

A key part of my anti-poverty plan is creating high quality jobs that pay salaries high enough to keep people out of poverty. In the last two decades we have watched the decimation of our manufacturing sector and those good-paying jobs haven't returned. There are so many incentives and investments that the government could make to support, revive and re-build our manufacturing sector, but instead they have squandered billions on ineffective and wasteful corporate tax cuts.

I think that raising the GIS is key to lifting and keeping seniors out of poverty.

We also have to protect pensions in this country by gradually increasing the CPP.

The provision of a Quebec-style childcare program will help many families get out of poverty.

A national housing strategy with the resources to back it up is also crucial. This is important across the country but particularly in first nations community.

Education funding is another important step because lack of post-secondary education funding to the provinces has lead to mortgage size debt loads for young people that often does not correspond to their income.

The EI system needs to be reformed to make sure that everyone has equal access to the benefits that they've paid into, when they need them, regardless of where they happen to be in the country.

Lastly we should also look at ending consumer and financial gouging that the federal government has jurisdiction over. One area is predatory payday lenders. The government is not fighting usurious interest rates overall and has left online payday lenders completely unregulated.

MegB

Any follow-up questions out there?

MegB

And from Unionist:

You've proposed allowing workers who quit or are terminated to have their workplace RRP accrued entitlement transferred to and managed by the CPP/QPP (if I understood correctly). I agree of course that we need to find ways to protect workplace pension plans. But I'm concerned your proposal would create a kind of two-tiered CPP/QPP, as well as introducing unplanned and uncontrolled liabilities to the plan. Could you please explain the origin of this proposal and whether I'm misunderstanding something about it? Thanks!

 

 

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Thanks for the question Unionist.

The idea of individuals transferring their pension entitlements to the CPP is novel, and yes could create some complexity.

The origin of this proposal comes from the fact that many other pension plans, including public sector plans, have devised methods for buying service and absorbing other pension plans. This usually  so I don't think the complexity is insurmountable. The full scope of the implementation of such a proposal will have to be studied extensively, but I think it is worth the potential complexity.

It has become clearer and clearer that the private pension system is fraught with problems and regularly fails its contributors. The enhancement of the CPP, including a transfer such as proposed, should be looked at as ways to expand the role of the CPP - it is the most efficient, portable and secure pension we can have in Canada.

Unionist

I find pensions almost impossible to understand, but if it means expanding the role of the CPP/QPP without jeopardizing its health, and gradually replacing workplace plans which are increasingly there only for lucky unionized folks (some of them) - good on you, it's worth at least studying and trying out. Thanks for the reply!

 

Lara34

Hi Peggy, it is so great to see you here on babble! I hope you'll have time to explain your midwifery proposal further. 

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Thanks Unionist for your interest. The future of pensions is an absolutely critical question - not only for seniors but for young workers who need to have confidence that they also will have retirement security.

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Hi Lara34. Thanks for your question. First and foremost, we need to get midwives included as a classification within Health Canada, such as we currently have for nurses and doctors. We need to involve midwives directly in policy development and federal funding decisions. We also need to work with midwifery associations to ensure that their accredition allows them to work throughout Canada, including in First Nations, Inuit, and Metis nations.

I've heard first hand from the Aboriginal Midwives Association about the critical importance of having midwives in the First Nations communities which are often remote and which today often remove pregnant women from their communities and fly them far from their family and support network. We need to involve First Nations, Inuit, and Metis communities to ensure that their communities are receiving the necessary funding for midwifery services, as well as health promotion programs such as pre-natal nutrition and Fetal Alcohol Spectrum Disorder programs.

Please check out my full policy at peggynash.ca

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

I don't know if my submitted question will be asked, but I'm still interested in knowing if you will work to undo and overturn Harper's cuts to social programs (I have a vested interested in a youth volunteer program called Katimavik which apparently may be on the chopping block).

MegB

Boom Boom, we'll be getting to that question.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Thanks! Smile

Lara34

Thank you for the response. I cannot tell you how glad I am to see this question addressed in the NDP leadership.   I don't know if this is fair to ask, but what kind of response have you had to this initiative from your NDP leadership colleagues?  And are you getting any negative response, from any sector?

Howard

Nice photo Peggy Smile

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Hi Lara34. I have not heard one negative response anywhere, but lots of good support. It seems that midwives and the families that love them are everywhere in Canada!

Todrick of Chat...

Peggy, would did you support the bombing of Libya?

Unionist

No fair - Howard's on skype with Peggy - favouritism!!

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Thanks Howard!

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

To answer Boom Boom: Yes i will definitely reverse a number of Harper's cuts. The axing of Status of Women offices across Canada and the defunding of organizations like Kairos shows the ideological bent of the Conservative government. They're in it to implement conservative ideology, not good policy.

It is particularly troubling that they are going after Katimavik as well, but not that surprising. The program empowers youth. It unites young people from across the country and lets them truely experience different communities and the different ways of being in this country. The last thing the Conservatives want is for people to realize that they have more in common than they thought. They don't want people to stand united. They would much rather continue their divise politics.

Yes, I would restore funding to Katimavik.

Howard

Unionist wrote:

No fair - Howard's on skype with Peggy - favouritism!!

Lol. Peggy is multi-tasking: babble + twitter.

grhyno grhyno's picture

MegB

Our next question is from Ryan1812:

I want to know what penalties or consequences will befall a province if they impose user fees for healthcare? Plain and simple. What will you do in event a province imposes healthcare user fees on their population?

 

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Thanks, Peggy - very much appreciated! Smile

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Hi Ryan.

Penalties under the Canada Health Act are linked to federal transfers to the provinces. More precisely, each provincial health care insurance plan must comply with the requirements of the Act before the province receives its total entitlement of cash transfers. If a province fails to comply, the federal government may impose a penalty and withhold part or all of the transfers. If a province is determined to implement user fees, then I will enforce the Canada Health Act using the provisions I just outlined.

I will say however, that the road to user fees can be stopped. I know that working closely with the provinces and making sure they receive the funding they need to operate their healthcare systems on a long-term basis, will stop them from even considering the option of user fees.

Howard

Peggy Nash wrote:

To answer Boom Boom: Yes i will definitely reverse a number of Harper's cuts. The axing of Status of Women offices across Canada and the defunding of organizations like Kairos shows the ideological bent of the Conservative government. They're in it to implement conservative ideology, not good policy.

It is particularly troubling that they are going after Katimavik as well, but not that surprising. The program empowers youth. It unites young people from across the country and lets them truely experience different communities and the different ways of being in this country. The last thing the Conservatives want is for people to realize that they have more in common than they thought. They don't want people to stand united. They would much rather continue their divise politics.

Yes, I would restore funding to Katimavik.

Where is my like button?

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Glad you found a like button Howard! Smile

Unionist

Howard is a like-minded person.

MegB

Our next question is from Chris Borst:

Most of our candidates have been charged with being earnest but dull. In your case, the charges have included "vague". Given the importance of the mass media in reaching and swaying voters, and the greater media access of the other two parties, what is your strategy to fight and win the "air war"?

 

Unionist

.

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Hi Chris,

Nothing wins the air war like bold ideas and clear direction. This past week I put forward the type of plan that can draw a lot of attention and sway a lot of voters. I think one of the main things we have to champion in the next 4 years is that of bringing in a proportional representation voting system.

People have felt so disconnected for so long from the electoral process because the outcome doesn't reflect their vote. I know the NDP has proposed this in the past, but we can shake things up and get people excited about implementing real change and getting a system where the parties actually cooperate with each other. Imagine if we could convince Canadians that their vote could actually bring the change they've wanted for so long.

For this we have to move beyond the platform. We need active campaigns across the country that include civil society, NGOs, our riding associations and our MPs. We can't just talk about our ideas anymore. We need to use new social media and new outreach methods to connect with people and get them excited about CHANGE - not just ideas.

If we remain bold and exciting and don't shy away from risks, I think we'll sway the 40% that didn't even bother to vote this last election.

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Hi Todrick: The NDP Caucus supported the UN mandate to protect Libyans from government attacks. We wanted the government to focus more on diplomacy and humanitarian assistance, and ultimately voted against extending the mission.

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Dunno if there's time or if this has been asked, but I have a question with regard to foreign policy: Harper is meeting with Netanyahu today, and although Harper says he prefers diplomacy, one can still hear the war drums beating against Iran. Any thoughts on this, Ms. Nash? (sorry for getting a second question in...)

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Thanks for the second question Boom Boom. Canada needs to urge Prime Minister Netanyahu to avoid military action against Iran. We don't need more militarization and should be focusing all efforts on diplomacy and prevention.

pragmaticjim

Hi Peggy.

I recently heard someone say that when the idea of co-operating with liberals to oust the conservatives from conservative held ridings, top liberals claimed that 50% of liberals would vote conservative, if the liberals did not run a candidate in their riding. Do you know if this was based on a scientific  poll, personal opinion, or concensus among top leaders?

MegB

We're all out of time.  Peggy, thank you so much for taking the time to answer our questions!

bazie

edit: too slow:p

Boom Boom Boom Boom's picture

Peggy Nash wrote:

Thanks for the second question Boom Boom. Canada needs to urge Prime Minister Netanyahu to avoid military action against Iran. We don't need more militarization and should be focusing all efforts on diplomacy and prevention.

Thank you thank you thank you!!!!

Peggy Nash Peggy Nash's picture

Thank you for all of the interesting questions and thanks Babble for hosting this forum! Hope to see you online soon!

trevorh_2000

Hi Peggy,

    As a small business owner, I am curious about your small business policy.  Do have any strategies or initiatives in mind for helping us 'ma & pa' operations to grow, hire more employees and become more sustainable?

 

Cheers,

 

Trevor

kim elliott kim elliott's picture

Thank you so much for coming by babble tonight Peggy! Good luck with the last weeks of the campaign!

Pages