rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Is strategic voting worthwhile in the Ontario election?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: Paul Schreiber/Flickr

On the eve of election day, I asked around to find out what people felt about strategic voting. In this case, I meant "ABC" -- anyone but conservative.

This drastic call comes because of who the Progressive Conservative leadership candidate is: Doug Ford.

The NDP have a new meaning behind their acronym: "No Doug Please."

The Ford empire has dominated politics of late, especially when Doug Ford's deceased brother was Toronto's mayor. A man of many flaws, he embarrassed all of Canada with his addiction and use of many substances, the most shocking of all crack cocaine.

I'm sure some emotions in response to Doug Ford are actually about his brother, but such is politics where the two brothers often tag-teamed during Toronto city hall sessions.

Known for their tough-on-crime agenda at city hall, which married a wealth of political training in the dynastic family with an everyman feel, Doug Ford has declared that a vote for him in this  election is a vote to make "Ontario Great Again" -- a hard-right rallying cry.

Doug Ford had unsuccessfully run for mayor in Canada's largest city but some polls place him in a distinct lead over NDP's Andrea Horwath who trails behind in second place. The Liberals, victims of their own long tenure, ride in at third place.

In an attempt to prevent Doug Ford from being our next Ontario premier, strategic voting has caught many people's attention this year, reminiscent of when Stephen Harper was running as Canada's prime minister against Justin Trudeau.

People who I asked about the feasibility of strategic voting gave mixed comments.

Gord Cawsey discusses how seriously he took the decision: "it's a tough one...I flirted with voting LPO [Liberal Party] this election because the incumbent has been in for 12 years and I figure that has some weight, but ultimately I voted early and went with the NDP....no way I want Ontario's most senior elected politician to be Doug freakin' Ford."

Amy Brown posting for a friend has an answer which strategically breaks down that having each party win something makes the transition to power smoother. "Please vote NDP. Looking at stats, there is about a 25 per cent chance of an NDP minority (the other chances are PC majority/minority). An NDP minority would depend on the cooperation of the Liberals in order to get things through the house, so strategically this is also the best way for your party to have some power. "

Brown gives more explanation of voting strategically, stating, "I'm voting NDP. Voting Liberal is not an option for my conscience at this juncture, and when the left lets itself be divided between Red and Orange (and a bit of green) it is the blue that wins."

But other people think strategic voting only plays into the hands of those, according to Dick Maquis, controlling the game and, "only helps those trying to hold power."

There was some serious hatred towards the Liberals for letting the party slide so far into this mess, Marquis also noted: "oh I HOPE and HOPE the Libs dont even keep their official party status... if they can't get 8 [seats] they are out...... best case scenario right there."

Polls have shown both that the PC party is well out in front and that the PCs and NDP are neck-and-neck. The possibility of a majority PC winning the race makes the thought of living in Ontario a scary and dangerous premise, much like how marginalized groups shivered when we found out that Trump was going to lead the U.S.

Time will only tell what becomes of Toronto, which will have a central role to play in determining what happens. 

Photo: Paul Schreiber/Flickr

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.