rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Who owns the energy industry?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Highly concentrated corporate ownership of Canada's energy sector and lack of government influence mean there's very little incentive for the fossil fuel industry to pay attention to the dangers of global climate change or worry about the communities and workers that depend on it.

That's the tough message behind a new study -- Who Owns Canada's Fossil Fuel Sector? Mapping the network of ownership and control -- released this morning by the Corporate Mapping Project, a six-year research initiative jointly run by the University of Victoria, the B.C. and Saskatchewan branches of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives, and the University of Alberta's Parkland Institute.

Major investors in the Canadian fossil fuel industry have sunk so much money in fossil fuel extraction their natural inclination is to ensure business continues as usual as long as possible, instead of addressing the serious climate issues facing the planet or offer any confidence decisions made in the Canadian oilpatch will be made in the public interest, the study reveals.

"Ownership is too centralized," said University of Victoria sociology professor Dr. Bill Carroll, co-author of the study and a director of the Corporate Mapping Project, in an interview. Industry decision makers, he said, "are really leaning toward maximization of their long-term investments. They want to get the full value out of their major corporate investments."

That explains why there has been so much corporate pressure to complete the now-public-owned Trans Mountain Pipeline Expansion Project and build other pipelines, he said, despite questionable economic cases for the investment.

That's understandable from the industry's perspective, Carroll added, but it is an incentive to continue expanding their operations and continuing their emphasis on fossil fuels as long as possible regardless of the damage to the planet's environment.

In the Corporate Mapping Project news release published this morning, Carroll summarized the study's findings as showing "substantial ownership and strategic control of Canada's fossil fuel industries are in the hands of a few major players, including all the Canadian big banks and several U.S. investment funds, governments, and some wealthy families."

Many of those investors, the study also shows, are located outside Canada. "These entities have both an interest in the sector's continued growth and the economic power to shape its future," he said in the news release.

This reality is relevant to both the response to climate change and the question of democracy in Canada, where so much power is concentrated in one area, argued Carroll, who worked on the study with Jouke Huijzer of Vrije University in Brussels.

The study analyzed shareholder and revenue data from recent years to map the true ownership picture of the Canadian energy industry. The researchers found that the top 25 owners accounted for more than 40 per cent of total Canadian fossil fuel industry revenues from 2010 to 2015, the news release said. The top two investors were Exxon Mobil Corp. and the Royal Bank of Canada, the study found.

Among the other findings summarized in the report:

  • Canadian-based fossil fuel companies majority owned by foreign corporations accounted for the largest share of the sector's revenues between 2010 and 2015, 16 per cent
  • Asset managers and investment funds accounted for about 15 per cent
  • Banks and life insurers had about 123 per cent, with the Big Five Canadian chartered banks consistently among the largest investors
  • Wealthy families such as the Desmarais clan, Alberta's Southerns and Li K-Shing of Hong Kong controlled 8.5 per cent
  • Foreign governments and corporate entities they own accounted for three per cent
  • Canadian governments held two per cent

The study also highlights the significance of interlocking directorships in controlling the industry, placing groups of investors in a position to exert control as a "constellation of interests."

The study also found that increasing Canadian control of the country's energy sector has made little difference to the way the industry functions, including its reluctance to invest in sustainable alternatives to fossil fuels.

Obviously, whether the owners are Canadians or foreigners, it's a risky strategy to count on a small group of private investors whose interests do not align with those of the pubic to make the right investments regarding transition from fossil fuel-based energy generation to renewable resources.

That makes it extremely difficult to plan for the energy future in a rational way. As Carroll observed, "we can't sunset the industry and ramp up renewables under this structure."

Formally known as Mapping the Power of the Carbon-Extractive Corporate Resource Sector, the Corporate Mapping Project is financed by a $2.5-million partnership grant awarded by the Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada, plus $2 million in matching funds from partner organizations. SSHRC Partnership Grants support formal partnerships between universities and others to improve understanding of critical issues facing Canadians.

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Image: NASA Goddard Space Flight/Flickr

Help make rabble sustainable. Please consider supporting our work with a monthly donation. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!


Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.