rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

COVID-19 proves Ernst & Young was out to lunch when it recommended privatizing two public long-term care providers

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $5 per month!

Health Minister Tyler Shandro, Alberta Health Services president Verna Yiu and Ernst & Young spokesperson John Bethel at the release of the AHS review report on February 3. Image: Government of Alberta

Does anyone remember the $2-million "review" of Alberta Health Services by Ernst & Young launched a year ago by the United Conservative Party government?

Health Minister Tyler Shandro and Alberta Health Services president and CEO Verna Yiu were both on hand to ensure we understood it was an important matter when the initial report of the multinational management-consulting firm based in London, England, was released on February 3 this year.

The report recommended a broad swath of health-care privatization, pay cuts and asset sales that would supposedly save the government of Alberta up to nearly $2 billion a year.

Quoting discredited sources like the Fraser Institute, Ernst & Young delivered what the government that hired it had clearly wanted: 57 recommendations including privatization of many surgical services, elimination of coverage for others, pay and benefit cuts for public health-care workers, and a selloff of publicly owned assets.

In other words, the usual neoliberal mayhem designed to finance huge tax cuts for foreign corporations and local billionaires while degrading public services to the point even more privatization can be justified.

Among the recommended "long-term strategies" on the consultant's list was elimination of support for surgical "procedures of limited value." Upon examination, quite a few of these turned out to be "procedures of value to women." This should have been no surprise, really, given the worldview of the UCP and its leader, Premier Jason Kenney.

Privatization targets included hospital housekeeping, food preparation, security, home care, and -- most significantly -- the sell-off of two large public long-term care providers, Capital Care in Edmonton and Carewest in Calgary.

The government didn't like every idea Ernst & Young came up with, however. It rejected out of hand the suggestion AHS should close or repurpose many rural hospitals, among the biggest cost items in Alberta's health care budget. This too was no surprise given the addresses of many of the UCP's most reliable voters.

The government announced on February 3 that AHS would have 100 days to figure out how "to develop a comprehensive implementation plan that will be submitted to the Minister of Health for approval."

That time was up yesterday, although no announcement was forthcoming.

Well, something has obviously changed since February -- the arrival on our shores of a teeny-tiny virus that causes huge problems wherever it goes. There's talk the requirement for AHS to produce its plan has been delayed until mid-August, perhaps while the government polls frantically to see what it can still get away with.

If ever there was a time to come to our senses and recognize that privatization of health-care services, in particular public-sector long-term care, is a bad idea, this is that moment!

The COVID-19 catastrophe in Alberta's and Canada's private, for-profit nursing homes alone tells you everything you need to know about the wisdom of this idea.

The COVID-19 death rate across Canada in private long-term care facilities is reported to be roughly four times the rate in public facilities. Alberta has had its share of these needless deaths, which can be traced back to corporate cost cutting and irresponsible, ideologically motivated policy decisions.

"Nowhere has the contrast between public and private care been starker than in our continuing care system," said Alberta Union of Provincial Employees vice-president Bonnie Gostola in a news release yesterday. "We need the government to make it clear that they will not sell off Capital Care and Carewest. The focus of our continuing-care system needs to be on residents, not shareholder dividends and bonuses for millionaire CEOs."

She noted that of the 35 COVID-19 outbreaks in supportive-living and long-term-care facilities in Alberta, only six have occurred in publicly run facilities. Private facilities make up the remaining 29 centres affected, 83 per cent of the continuing care outbreaks.

"In the 100 days since this report has been released, we've had a clear case made for keeping our health care system public," Gostola said. "Patients and workers deserve better than to have our system sold off to profiteers. We cannot put vulnerable people at risk of inferior private care after we make it through this pandemic."

Of course, it would be naïve to think the most ideological Alberta government since William Aberhart's Social Credit government was elected in 1935 is going to change its tune, although it may not whistle its discordant notes quite so loudly as it used to before the coronavirus arrived in Canada.

Indeed, even the Socreds, after they'd calmed down once Ernest Manning became premier in 1943, sensibly banned private-sector nursing homes.

The UCP may delay for a while, perhaps even until after the next election. But don't expect anything to change but the timing of the announcements.

Then again, these are guys who don't mind fighting an all-out war on doctors in the middle of a global pandemic.

What they do next probably depends on how strong the public reaction is.

David Climenhaga, author of the Alberta Diary blog, is a journalist, author, journalism teacher, poet and trade union communicator who has worked in senior writing and editing positions at The Globe and Mail and the Calgary Herald. This post also appears on his blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Image: Government of Alberta

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.