rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

What did Alberta Finance Minister Travis Toews actually say about AISH last week?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $5 per month!

Alberta Finance Minister Travis Toews. Image: David J. Climenhaga​

So, what did Travis Toews actually say about assured income for the severely handicapped (AISH) when he said whatever he said to a Grande Prairie local news website one week ago today?

According to the first report on MyGrandePrairieNow.com, the finance minister, who is also MLA for Grande Prairie-Wapiti, said that the possible end to AISH benefits has been brought to the table, though nothing has yet been set in stone.

Unsurprisingly, that phrase, which was not in quotation marks in the story, sparked considerable outrage and concern as soon as a link to the report began circulating on social media.

Subsequently, the news site deleted the line from the story, substituting it with a note that the top that said: "The original version of this story included a misquoted statement about AISH from MLA Toews. We apologize for the error and the confusion. We have reached out to MLA Toews to clarify the matter."

Not to be over-critical of a local news organization -- the flaws in the story, including the omission of the circumstances in which Toews made his remark, are typical of news media in general nowadays -- this clarification nevertheless does little to clarify and plenty to confuse.

If Toews was misquoted, why wasn't the original statement in quotes? If the reporter's paraphrase of whatever the minister said was in error, why hasn't either the minister or the website clarified what he said? And if MyGrandePrairieNow felt the need to reach out to the local MLA to explain what he meant, where's the explanation?

It seems likely the idea of putting an end to AISH benefits has indeed been brought to the table, whether or not Toews said anything about it to MyGrandePrairieNow.

After all, in late 2019, the Kenney government de-indexed AISH payments, meaning they would no longer rise with inflation.

Last month, on September 11, the normally pro-UCP Calgary Herald reported there is a plan within the United Conservative Party government to shrink AISH payments. Yes, the Herald quoted an unnamed government official saying, "there is a push to potentially make some cuts," and "they're not going to be that minor in nature."

Cutting monthly payments to the approximately 70,000 Albertans with disabilities who rely AISH for their basic needs was described by one person interviewed for the story as "absolutely inhumane," a view many Albertans apparently shared. The report sparked an uproar that caused the government to back off a little.

A couple of days later, Community and Social Services Minister Rajan Sawhney responded to the anger by announcing there would be no AISH cuts after all.

Yet two days after that, Premier Jason Kenney told reporters instead of cutting benefits for all AISH recipients, the government would think about cutting some recipients off AISH entirely.

"The population of people qualifying has been growing far, far faster than the overall population," the premier asserted, so his government would be looking at "what are the criteria, how do we define severely handicapped in this day and age?"

Taken together, all this could suggest last Monday's MyGrandePrairieNow story was closer to the truth than the minister and local MLA wished to see in print before the UCP's issues managers have a chance to manage our perceptions of the government's plans.

It is entirely reasonable to believe that, given what we do know, the Kenney government does intend to cut the money it spends supporting Alberta's most vulnerable citizens -- who are now living on just $1,685 a month.

Toews could clear the air by simply stating plainly what it is the government plans to do, or, if it hasn't made up its mind, what the options are it's considering.

One painless solution might be a modest corporate tax increase, since there's plenty of evidence higher taxes don't kill jobs and also lots that the UCP's corporate tax cuts sure haven't created any, and may even be financing corporate automation and relocation strategies that are making unemployment in Alberta even more severe.

Don't expect anything like that to happen, though, while there are still people living on $20,220 a year who can be squeezed a little more.

Say hello to Lunchbox O'Toolez!

Back in the day, the U.K.'s Private Eye magazine, a scurrilous political and media gossip sheet printed fortnightly on greasy newsprint and read widely among the U.K.'s chattering classes, featured a regular column insulting classical musicians in general and the London Symphony Orchestra in particular by one Lunchtime O'Boulez.

For some reason this name from your blogger's adolescent reading habits resurfaced last week with the publication of those lame Conservative Party of Canada social media memes introducing the party's new leader, Erin O'Toole.

"Canada doesn't need a poster boy," the memes averred beside an unflatteringly pixelated image of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau. No, it continued, "Canada needs a handyman." The latter statement was paired with a picture of a smiling O'Toole.

The response on social media, to say the least, was derisive, with many suggestions the Conservative strategic braintrust had best try again. (To be fair, this is preferable to O'Toole's dogwhistly campaign slogan, "Take back Canada!")

As soon as I saw the meme, though, I thought: "Lunchbox O'Toolez!"

And now, I'm afraid, that is how I will always think of O'Toole, at least until he goes down the unhappy trail broken by Andrew Scheer, and Jason Kenney finally gets his chance to return to his rightful place in Ottawa.

David Climenhaga, author of the Alberta Diary blog, is a journalist, author, journalism teacher, poet and trade union communicator who has worked in senior writing and editing positions at The Globe and Mail and the Calgary Herald.

Image: David J. Climenhaga​

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.