rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

UCP's favourite researcher says she never thought Canadian environmental groups were used by U.S. interests

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Vancouver blogger Vivian Krause. Image: Vivian Krause/Facebook

What is the United Conservative Party's position, pray, about Vancouver blogger Vivian Krause's bombshell assertion she always understood the environmental conspiracy to landlock Alberta's oilsands she promoted so energetically had nothing to do with the U.S. oil industry advancing its interests at Canada's expense?

Wherever it came from, the notion big American corporations and foundations were bankrolling Canadian environmental charities to achieve a market advantage over their supposedly more ethical Canadian counterparts was at the heart of Premier Jason Kenney's successful crusade to unite the right, drive the Alberta NDP from power, and restore Conservative rule in Wild Rose Country.

Whatever the UCP's favourite researcher has been saying -- and there was vigorous public discussion about that last week -- her statement that she has never accused environmental organizations of being used by U.S. interests to landlock Canadian bitumen arrived with the force of a thunderclap.

"'No evidence': Researcher behind 'anti-Alberta' inquiry backs off assertion," said the headlines on the Edmonton Journal, Toronto Star, Global News, CTV and other websites, all of which published a short, early story by the Canadian Press.

If nothing else, this certainly suggests mainstream Alberta news media, mostly sympathetic to the UCP, had always assumed the conspiracy theory originated with Krause, whose work was championed by the UCP and fossil-fuel industry groups like the powerful Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers.

Nor have major media organizations ever made much effort to debunk the theory, unlike such independent commentators as energy reporter Markham Hislop and Sandy Garossino of the National Observer.

The headline in The Globe and Mail was more cautious and nuanced: "Critics say researcher behind allegations that prompted 'anti-Alberta' inquiry backs off from one of her major claims."

But while that updated version of the Canadian Press story placed Krause's assertion "she has never accused environmental groups of being used by U.S. interests to further that country's oil industry" right at the top, the arguments of her critics are set out clearly and fairly too.

"I certainly can't pin that on any environmental groups," the author quoted Krause saying.

The story then cited a tweet by University of Calgary law professor Martin Olszynski, asking Krause: "Since you've seen no evidence of $ from commercial oil interests, do you think it was fair/reasonable for you to keep making inferences to that effect?"

Indeed, the record of many statements by Krause, and many more by Kenney, other UCP politicians and sympathetic media commentators, left many Albertans with the impression that was Krause's view.

The notion Alberta was being unfairly targeted to support U.S. interests was precisely the theory upon which Kenney's so-called "Public inquiry into anti-Alberta energy campaigns" was based.

Even before Krause's unexpected statement hit the headlines, the inquiry was in disarray.

On Wednesday, Commissioner Steve Allan requested and was granted a fourth deadline extension to complete the inquiry's work. Its final report was originally due on July 2, 2020. He was most recently expected to report on May 31. Now he will have two more months to complete the report, and the government will have three months after that to decide what to do with it.

So Krause's statement, a bombshell whether or not she thinks it should have been, leaves the impression the whole premise for the inquiry, and Jason Kenney's war room as well, is unravelling like a badly knitted sweater.

Only on Wednesday did Energy Minister Sonya Savage say, "Our government promised Albertans that we would fully investigate the widely reported foreign-funded campaign to landlock our resources and we are committed to fulfilling that promise."

"We need to shine a spotlight on the foreign source of funds behind the campaign to landlock Canadian energy," Premier Kenney said the same day.

But while assailing the CP story for lacking quotes, Matt Wolf, the premier's issues manager, tweeted:

"The Alberta Government has not alleged that this funding was somehow part of a (sic) active conspiracy between US environmental orgs and US energy producers to hamstring competitors in Canada for their own corporate benefit."

So what is the government saying? As many of the government's critics have asked, if foreign fossil-fuel companies are welcome to lobby for projects and policies in Alberta, how can foreign environmentalists be prevented from advocating for causes in which they believe?

Does Wolf's tweet represent another Kenney government flip-flop? It is sure to be taken that way by large numbers of Albertans, including many of the UCP's most loyal supporters.

Or is it merely tacit acknowledgement that Allan has been unable to find any evidence of the conspiracy he was charged with uncovering?

The whole inquiry enterprise, and to a significant extent the UCP's "energy war room" as well, depends on the belief there really is a foreign-funded conspiracy. Otherwise, the inquiry is nothing more than an exercise in bullying and an assault on free speech.

If the UCP is now abandoning this pretence, the foundational narrative that brought Jason Kenney to power has all the substance of a puff of smoke.

David Climenhaga, author of the Alberta Diary blog, is a journalist, author, journalism teacher, poet and trade union communicator who has worked in senior writing and editing positions at The Globe and Mail and the Calgary Herald.

Image: Vivian Krause/Facebook

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.