rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

The financial portion of our economy

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Source: Cauvin, Christian, "L'insoutenable dynamique du capitalisme financier",

A very interesting text by Christian Cauvin, published in a special issue of Alternatives économiques, contains a particularly revealing graph. It addresses the growing weight of the financial economy.

Graph 1: Dividends and operating surpluses in France, indexed to 100 = 1993 level

N.B.: gross operating surplus (GOS) equals incorporated enterprises' gross profit before payment of property income.

The author analyzes the graph as follows: "Businesses have not given up on conventional debt patterns, especially bank credit. However, market financing has progressed much more rapidly, to the point that bank credit no longer represents more than about a quarter of their equities, against nearly 40 per cent thirty years earlier. As a consequence of this new "shareholder capitalism," dividends -- paid to shareholders to remunerate their contribution in capital -- have exploded, progressing much faster than the company's profit and loss statement."

As I read this commentary, I wondered how things were on our side of the Atlantic. Are shares rocketing here too, whilst operating income is more stable? Here is the same graph for Canada:

Graph 2: Dividends and operating surpluses in Canada, indexed to 100 = 2000 level 

Source: Statistics Canada, CANSIM, Tableau 180-0003, author's calculations

Unfortunately, the data available at Statistics Canada does not allow us to cover the same period as does Alternatives économiques. However, it is still interesting because it covers the last economic crisis, which started out as a financial crisis.

Let's follow the chronological evolution and comment on the graph. From 2000 to 2003, operating income was falling slightly (ranging between 89 and 99), whilst dividends were rising (reaching 118 and 154). Afterwards (from 2004 to 2007), the curves run parallel and dividends retain their advantage.

When the crisis strikes, we see a huge difference (yet another!). While operating income dives and goes back up again, dividends rise swiftly (from 208 to 355 in just two years) before dropping. It's a common reflex for businesses listed on the stock exchange: to increase dividends when times are rough to avoid shareholders selling their stock en masse. One of the consequences is that in the midst of a crisis -- as people are being laid off because operating income is insufficient -- more money is given away to shareholders.

This strategy is employed even though, according to a Forbes columnist, caring this much about shareholders is 'the dumbest idea in the world'. Furthermore, we see once more that crises do not strike each and everyone in the same way.

That being said, this graph could be the source of another statistical measure of financialization, which could complement the Jimbo Index, developed by Eric Pineault on the basis of work by Jim Stanford (which we have used in the past). While Stanford makes a comparison which allows us to see the general direction of the economy (by comparing real assets to financial assets), the comparison put forward by Cauvin allows us to see the difference between what is actually going on in corporations and its consequences on shareholders.

This article was written by Simon Tremblay-Pepin, a researcher with IRIS, a Montreal-based progressive think tank. 

Graph 1 source: Cauvin, Christian, "L'insoutenable dynamique du capitalisme financier", Alternatives économiques, special issue, n° 97, 3rd trimestre, 2013, p. 31.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.