rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Why the New York Times 'richest middle class' title may not be all good news

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $1 per month!

This week the New York Times published a study on American income inequality and the middle class which reported that America's middle class is no longer the 'world's richest' -- Canada's middle class is. Not surprisingly, this sent Twitter abuzz.

According to the authors, "Middle-class incomes in Canada -- substantially behind [the United States] in 2000 -- now appear to be higher than in the United States. …. Median income in Canada pulled into a tie with median United States income in 2010 and has most likely surpassed it since then."

At the heart of the study is data on median after-tax income, adjusted per person and by "a common adjustment known as purchasing power parity," which the authors explain, "takes into account the relative cost of similar items -- say, a Toyota or a Big Mac -- in different countries."

Simon Fraser University Economist Anke Kessler noted that several high-ranking European countries were excluded from the analysis, including Norway, Luxemburg and Switzerland, which rank higher in OECD pre-tax data.

Economist Kevin Milligan noted that past success doesn't necessarily guarantee future increases. "By some measures, we've had a decent run in last 15 years. But for next 15 years do we a) put a 3rd spouse to work or b) find oil in Oshawa?" he tweeted.  Even Minister of Employment, Social Development & Multiculturalism, Jason Kenney, got in on the Twitter discussion with a series of tweets about Canadian income growth and he used the article as an opportunity to criticize Justin Trudeau.

However, there is a different interpretation of the New York Times data.

Since the researchers measured after tax income, this data measures disposable income rather than earnings per se. And over the course of this data period (1980 to 2010) the amount of taxes paid by the median quintile has decreased, in real terms even as incomes have increased.

Average effective income taxes on the middle quintile has decreased from between 16 per cent and 17 per cent during much of the 1990s, to 12.0 per cent in 2010. Essentially the effective taxes of the middle class have been cut by about a quarter.  At the same time, federal revenue from personal income taxes has shrunk from 8.6 per cent of GDP in 2000-1 to 7.0 per cent of GDP in 2010-11(2012 Federal Budget, Fiscal Reference Tables. "Table 4: Revenues").

While this may have helped Canada edge above our international counterparts in terms of middle-class disposable income -- it has also weakened the state and our social programs.

The government may think that this study shows that they're doing a good job on the economy, but the reality is that it shows that Canadians aren't overtaxed as the right wing likes to pretend.

Kayle Hatt is a Research Associate with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives' National Office and was the CCPA's 2013 Andrew Jackson Progressive Economics Intern.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.