rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Prescription for change: The case for a national drug plan

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: sharyn morrow/flickr

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Canada is the only country with public health care and no national drug plan. This means that 24 per cent of Canadians have no coverage for medications prescribed by their doctor. We need a national drug plan that takes care of everyone. Tommy Douglas, founder of Canada's universal medicare system, didn't intend for public health care to include only hospitals and doctors. This was intended to be just the beginning, with coverage of drugs and other services to follow.

Our current patchwork of provincial programs and work-based plans means that access to drugs depends on where you live and where you work. Most Canadians are covered by private drug insurance plans through their jobs. These plans vary enormously and are lost if the worker quits or is laid off, and sometimes even when he or she retires. But for the 24 per cent of Canadians with no coverage at all, the cost of medications falls to them alone. This could mean thousands of dollars annually on the backs of those without workplace coverage.

Last year alone 1 in 10 people in Canada did not fill a prescription because of the cost. This leads to people taking lower than prescribed dosages or not taking their medications at all. In many cases this will compromise a person's health and cause their return to the hospital for further care. This lack of care puts the patient's health at risk and increases the unnecessary strain on the hospital system.

The current patchwork of plans does nothing to restrain drug costs. Not only do work-based drug plans provide limited benefits and little security, administering thousands of different plans is expensive and inefficient. In addition to saving administrative costs and choosing safer, less-expensive well-established drugs, a national drug plan would allow for bargaining with the pharmaceutical companies to pay lower prices for drugs.

Canada could save $11 billion through the implementation of a national drug plan. A national drug plan would also be able to work with the medical profession to improve prescribing practices by giving doctors independent information on the value and benefits of the treatments they're considering.

A national drug plan must:

  • be publically funded and administrated;
  • control costs;
  • provide universal access at no cost to patients;
  • ensure safe and appropriate use of medications.

It would cover essential drug costs the way medicare covers hospitals and physicians, providing universal access to safe and appropriate care.

Without a national drug plan, Canadians will continue to pay some of the highest prices for medications in the OECD while many families face the financial strain of covering these costs. It is no longer acceptable to provide access to physicians but not the medications they prescribe.

For more information about a national drug plan, visit Canadian Health Coalition's new website Healthcare for All, or the CCPA report The Economic Case for Universal Pharmacare (2010).

Melissa Newitt is a CCPA Research Associate and the National Coordinator (Interim) of the Canadian Health Coalition. You can follow Melissa on Twitter @melissanewitt.

Photo: sharyn morrow/flickr

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.