rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Should Canada have completed a trade deal in the middle of an election?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: SumOfUs/flickr

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

The Obama administration pulled out all the stops to wrap up the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP) negotiations last week. Trade ministers, including Canada's Ed Fast, were summoned to Atlanta for a final session.

The participation of Fast was controversial back in Canada, where a federal election campaign is in full swing. Concluding a sweeping, still-secret trade treaty on the brink of election day is unprecedented and arguably illegitimate.

Parliamentary convention dictates that caretaker governments refrain from taking major policy steps during an election. The sitting government is also obliged to fully consult with opposition leaders on any such decisions, but there's no sign this has occurred. 

We were reminded of this when the Privy Council Office posted the guidelines for the caretaker period just before the writ dropped. They included a passage, absent in previous versions, stating "there may be compelling reasons for continued participation by Ministers and/or officials in specific activities such as treaty negotiations."

This conveniently timed insertion hardly gets government off the hook. The caretaker convention authorizes interim governments to act in real emergencies like the Syrian refugee crisis, where events are truly beyond Canada's control. They do not provide cover where political expediency is the driving factor. 

The Obama administration was keen to burnish its legacy by delivering a major trade deal. There was no reason for Canada to play by this opportunistic U.S. timeframe. Even though an agreement was hammered out in Atlanta, the president must give Congress 90 days' notice before signing anything, and that only starts the legislative clock ticking. Congressional consideration would extend well into 2016, making the TPP a political football during the U.S. elections. 

The Canadian government could have argued for a postponement of the Atlanta meeting. More time would have allowed whoever forms the next government to be fully briefed and properly consider the myriad issues. Until then, Canada could have been represented by senior officials charged with defending the country's interests but refraining from final commitments. 

But far from arguing for a delay, the Conservative government appeared eager to drop a TPP bombshell into the final weeks of the federal campaign. New Zealand's veteran Trade Minister Tim Groser recently told his country's media that "The Canadians are negotiating as if there's no election."

Whatever one's position on this sweeping deal, there are no prospects for a fair, informed debate before the election. The Conservative government will be in full control of information about the text, and free to spin it to its own partisan advantage.  

This would not be the first time this government has run roughshod over constitutional convention. Prorogation of Parliament, contempt of Parliament, misleading Parliament, omnibus budget bills … the list of abuses is long. 

There are political risks in such Machiavellian maneuverings. Atlanta was not an easy meeting. Negotiators admit that some thorny issues, including market access for dairy and content rules for the auto industry, were not within reach of a clear solution.

At the last meeting, the U.S. secretly cut a side deal with Japan to allow Japanese and other automakers to sell cars and parts with high levels of Chinese content duty free in North America, undercutting the Canadian and Mexican industries.  Economist Jim Stanford estimates this could cost the Canadian auto sector 24,600 jobs. 

With energy and commodity prices in the gutter, many Canadians understand it is not a good time to be sacrificing well-paying jobs or weakening struggling manufacturers that are the main hope for reviving our stagnant economy.

These high-profile issues are just the tip of the iceberg. The TPP could mean major changes in matters ranging from access to medicines to the weakening of privacy protections. Unfortunately, there is no way these and other potential surprises buried in the massive text will be properly aired in the closing days of the campaign.

Striking a TPP deal during the election flies in the face of democratic convention and the government's own promises of openness. Canada's negotiating partners must understand the current government does not have the authority to commit to this trade treaty. 

Whoever forms the next government must make their own decisions, in consultation with the Canadian public, and should not feel bound by whatever was agreed in Atlanta.

Scott Sinclair is Senior Trade Researcher with the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and the director of the CCPA's Trade and Investment Research Project. This op-ed was first published in the Toronto Star

Photo: SumOfUs/flickr

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.