rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Household debt is far too high -- and why it's going to go higher still

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: KMR Photography/flickr

When the National Balance Sheet came out this month, the media focused on how the record-high household debt-to-GDP ratio is now above 100 per cent, the implication being that households should pay down that debt... somehow. This is far from the full story. We need to look at the broader debt picture across all sectors.

In much neoclassical economic theory, debt is considered irrelevant, not even worth examining. It's how economists could completely miss the biggest economic crash since the Great Depression in 2007-08, which was driven by -- you guessed it -- very high debt levels. The popular thinking is that, in all cases, debt should be "paid off" in the way a person pays down their mortgage. Often missed is the connection new debt plays in funding economic growth.

Debt has a funny way of shifting between sectors: when government debt goes down, household debt rises to compensate. In fact, debt across all sectors in the economy has been relatively stable at roughly 230 per cent of GDP. (That was until 2009, when it started to climb rapidly, but more on that shortly.) Break it down and we see the federal debt burden is at an all-time low, while the provinces experience all-time-high debt-to-GDP ratios. This year's $29-billion federal deficit will not change this much.

Source: CANSIM 378-0121, 385-0032, 380-0063 and author's calculations

So what of the surging household debt announced in the National Balance Sheet? This isn't about big screen TVs, it's about housing prices, which are also at all-time highs, pulling mortgage debt upwards in tow. If we want to see household debt decline, house prices need to come down, but outside Alberta we're a long way from that scenario. Over the past year, households have racked up a deficit of $73 billion -- more than double the federal deficit.

Corporate debt (for non-banks) has been fairly stable since 1990, but this started to change 2012 and has reached 120 per cent of GDP today, higher than household debt. This could be good news if companies were taking out loans to buy equipment and make Canada more productive... but they aren't. Banks (financial corporate) also have substantially higher debt since 1990s, although this is related to how they are funding real estate loans to Canadians.

Source: CANSIM 378-0121, 385-0032, 380-0063 and author's calculations

Personal debt often has a negative connotation, but debt over the whole economy is unavoidable and often critical to economic growth. It is large spikes or imbalances in that debt that can cause problems. For instance, within that $73-billion household deficit, $23 billion is extra household consumption and $4 billion is new house construction over the past year. In other words, it is economic growth.

Corporations ran a $64-billion deficit in the past year, but none of it was invested in new capacity. In fact, corporate non-residential structures plus machinery and equipment actually dropped by $10 billion in the past year, reducing economic growth. Much of the additional corporate debt ended up in mergers and acquisitions instead of in real economic growth. Government spending on infrastructure is also unchanged since last year, despite $6 billion in additional expenditures, and so adding little to growth.

While we may not like high household debt, reducing it would mean decreased house prices and reduced economic growth. For better or worse, ultra-low mortgage rates leading to ever higher household debt is the economic path we've charted. Is this a good thing? Obviously not. But unless we can accept significantly higher government deficits, it's what we're stuck with: mediocre growth funded by ever-higher household debt.

David Macdonald is a senior economist at the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Follow him on Twitter @DavidMacCdn.

Photo: KMR Photography/flickr

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.