rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Even worse than Harper?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

The thing that is most alarming about Michael Ignatieff's threat to force yet another election is Michael Ignatieff himself. He thinks he can win, which is a particularly scary prospect.

Based on Ignatieff's writings, musings and comments, there's every chance a Michael Ignatieff government may well be worse than Harper's.

"Not possible", you say? Well, put a spotlight on Ignatieff's policies and priorities for a minute and a disturbing picture becomes quickly clear.

Take the tar sands. While Harper has overseen a steady and appalling expansion of the world's dirtiest oil, he's not been nearly so triumphalist as Michael Ignatieff. Remember Ignatieff's comments in a Vancouver pub last January? He said the tar sands are "awesome" and "awe inspiring". He revelled in the prospect of how "powerful" the tar sands make Canada. Those would be the same tar sands that are Canada's largest and fastest growing source of greenhouse gas emissions.

When asked at the same meeting about Barack Obama's now fading promise to renegotiate NAFTA, Ignatieff reacted as if the very idea was a threat to Canada. He pointed to Canada's energy supplies as the major card we can use against the U.S. But not a card to improve labour or environmental protections. Rather, his priority was that "...we can't allow a protectionist tide to take over economic policy in the United States."

Ignatieff is a strong proponent of corporate trade deals. When challenged last spring to vote against the Conservative legislation for the proposed Canada/Colombia trade agreement in light of Colombia's horrifying human rights record, Michael Ignatieff's Liberals - the ostensible Official Opposition - specifically declined.

But then basic human rights seem a malleable concept for the former Harvard professor. His comment in a 2004 op. ed. in the New York Times not only bear repeating, but deserve big prominence in the upcoming election. Canadians need to call out Ignatieff and demand to know what he really meant when he wrote, "To defeat evil, we may have to traffic in evils: indefinite detention of suspects, coercive interrogations, targeted assasinations, even pre-emptive war."

Like the pre-emptive war on Iraq.

Like the indefinite detention of Omar Khadr.

Like the coercive interrogations and targeted assasinations of Dick Cheney, but perhaps implemented in a more Liberal or intellectual fashion.

Michael Ignatieff's vapid new English language TV ads say Canada needs a government with a "new way of thinking", a government that "thinks big and has a global perspective" so that "Canada can take on the world and win".

Sounds pretty creepy to me. Seems like that big new way of thinking means even more tar sands expansion, pre-emptive wars, indefinite detentions and corporate trade deals at the expense of human rights. 

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.