rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Canadian culture crisis: Time for a revamp of cultural support

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: flickr/ Caleb Roenigk

Like this article? Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

A clear picture of the economic reality experienced by Canadian artists is taking shape: times are tough. The Writers' Union of Canada (TWUC) report 'Devaluing Creators, Endangering Creativity' tells us just how tough: Canadian writers earn about $12,000 a year, with 81 per cent of them living below the poverty line, and women writers earning on average 45 per cent less than their male counterparts.

Though revenues in the industry are declining, Canadian book publishing still pulled in $1.9 billion in 2012. But the Writers' Union report highlights that writers are now working more to earn less than they did when surveyed in 1998, creating a "cultural emergency." Authors now find themselves having to take on some of the traditional work of publishers, including editing and promotion, but also are seeing a decline in their contacts, advances, and royalty rates.

TWUC chairperson Harry Thurston declares that "this is not a sustainable situation." If writers continue to not be able to support themselves from their creative work, they will eventually seek employment elsewhere, to the detriment of the diversity of creative expression that we all experience.

And it's not just writers who are struggling to earn a living. National Household Survey data reveals that many types of Canadian artists, from musicians to dancers and artisans, pull in incomes around or below the poverty line. This data on how Canadian artists are faring economically suggests a Canadian cultural sector in crisis.

If we want Canadian artists to keep creating, something's got to give.

The Canada Council's new plan for arts funding in Canada reorganizes 147 programs down to just six, grouped under themes like "explore and create" and "engage and sustain." Some established artists have voiced their frustration and confusion about just what these program headings mean and how they will work.

The Canada Council says that some of the impulse for this overhaul came from a growing awareness that younger artists are creating and distributing their work in new and multidisciplinary ways that straddle or are neglected by traditional discipline-specific funding categories.

If established artists are being squeezed, are emerging and young artists even getting out of the gate?

More than 60 years ago, the Massey Commission set out to take stock of Canadian culture and its needs. The report, released in 1951, spoke to the growing threat of the Americanization of culture, and catalyzed the creation of the Canada Council in 1957 in order to nurture and protect Canadian identity through homegrown Canadian art.

The Canada Council's new funding model acknowledges major changes in the way that Canadian artists are working today, but we need more than just a new funding model to meet the challenges that artists experience. The problems facing the cultural sector lie deeper than how artists access funding.

Perhaps it's time to undertake another large-scale inventory of the Canadian culture scene in order to more fully assess the value of culture in Canada and the needs of creators and audiences. National Household Survey data shows that there are more Canadians employed as artists and cultural workers than there are in automotive manufacturing. Recent economic crises have seen discussions of bailouts to banking and automotive sectors, but the notion of acute intervention in the cultural sector doesn't have the same traction.

We need to gather more knowledge about what's going on in the cultural sector in order to create more public awareness about why it's important for the cultural sector to exist in Canada at all, about why it's important to hear from diverse stories from diverse creators across artistic mediums.

We also need to gather more knowledge about the activities of young people who are entering the cultural sector and who may be working in ways that differ from established ones. Recognizing the differing needs and trajectories of youth who are entering this field could allow for policies to better match unfolding economic and creative directions.

Support for culture is not only important for creators. The Canadian Index of Wellbeing tracks the role of access to culture as a key indicator of quality of life, and notes that "losses in our capacity to develop and provide meaningful venues and opportunities for leisure and culture threatens the wellbeing of individuals, communities, and society at large."

In its 'Devaluing Creativity' report, the Writers' Union of Canada suggests the need for continued work to ensure that writers are compensated fairly, that they sign fair contracts, and that programs offering support to writers are protected.

It's necessary to push to maintain this infrastructure around creative work, but for opportunities to make a living from creative work to be equitably spread, we also need to develop broader public support for culture in Canada. Developing more awareness about the struggles of artists is one place to start.

Miranda Campbell is an assistant professor in the School of Creative Industries at Ryerson University and the author of Out of the Basement: Youth Cultural Production in Practice and in Policy, which was shortlisted for the 2013/2014 Donner Prize for the best public policy book by a Canadian.

Photo: flickr/ Caleb Roenigk

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.