rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Will Energy East be operational before the Northern Gateway pipeline?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: travis blanston/flickr

Please help rabble.ca stop Harper's election fraud plan. Become a monthly supporter.

The short answer is no, our commitment is stop both pipelines.

The Enbridge Northern Gateway is a 1,177-kilometre, 525,000-barrels-per-day pipeline westbound to the Pacific coast, while TransCanada Energy East is a 4,600-kilometre, 1.1 million-bpd pipeline eastbound to the Atlantic coast. Both companies seek to have their pipelines operational by 2018. And both pipelines represent a destructive expansion of the tar sands and greenhouse gas emissions that, if unchecked, will only accelerate our path to climate catastrophe.

Bloomberg reports, "Chances are good [the Energy East pipeline] to Canada's east coast will beat to market Enbridge Inc.'s Northern Gateway project, even with its approval this week by Prime Minister Stephen Harper's government. ...Energy East seems a walk in the park by comparison [to the obstacles now faced by the Northern Gateway pipeline]. Much of the line already exists in the form of an underused natural gas conduit. New Brunswick, home to Canada's largest refinery, has lobbied for a pipeline to Saint John, one of the country's largest ice-free ports, as a way to promote jobs in an economically-depressed region."

The article notes that John Stephenson, president of Stephenson & Company Capital Management, says, "Everything is already there. You're converting an existing pipeline and there are no land claim issues. And you have a province at the end of the line that wants the oil." And Greg Stringham, a vice-president at the Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers, says, "The big growth markets are in India and in China", while Asim Ghosh, chief executive officer of Husky Energy Inc., says Energy East would allow western Canadian crude to reach India for the same transport costs as a pipeline to the Pacific coast.

This may mean that even though the Harper government has given its nod to the Enbridge pipeline, there may be increased pressure -- given the wall of opposition that has formed in British Columbia -- to move ahead with greater urgency on the TransCanada proposal because it's a less established fight at this moment and not as high profile for now as Northern Gateway. And while resistance needs to stay strong in British Columbia, there is speculation that Harper's tepid approval of Northern Gateway suggests a certain backing away from the pipeline given its political obstacles.

So yes there may be a new push for Energy East, but there is also strong opposition emerging against this pipeline. The Bloomberg article highlights, "Not everyone is in favour of a new cross-country pipeline. The Council of Canadians, an advocacy group, says the environmental risks would trump the few benefits the project would generate. Equiterre, a Montreal-based environmental organization, says emissions associated with Energy East would be even greater than the carbon impact from Keystone XL, and put local habitats along the route at risk from spills."

There is also significant First Nations opposition to the Energy East pipeline.

People across the country working to stop these pipelines will need to find opportunities to share information with each other, discuss the strategies that are working, be inspired by each other, and express practical solidarity at key moments in these campaigns.

To read about campaigns against these pipelines, please see Northern Gateway and Energy East.

Photo: travis blanston/flickr

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.