rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Trudeau breaking UNDRIP promises brings warning of '20 Standing Rocks'

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Flickr/Peg Hunter

The Liberal party promised in their election campaign to support the work of reconciliation and continue the process of truth telling and healing. So far, they're failing. 

"We will work alongside provinces and territories, and with First Nations, the Métis Nation, and Inuit, to enact the recommendations of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission, starting with the implementation of the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples," the party stated on Oct. 19, 2015.

The Liberals appeared to make good on the latter part of that promise on May 9, 2016, when Indigenous Affairs Minister Carolyn Bennett and Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould announced at the United Nations in New York that Canada fully endorsed UNDRIP. 

This was well received by many especially given the Harper government had voted against UNDRIP in September 2007 and then only endorsed the declaration, with qualifications, in November 2010. 

"Those qualifications were officially registered by the previous Conservative government over concerns that the document’s requirement for the 'free, prior and informed consent' of indigenous people on issues that affect them could be interpreted as a veto over development and other decisions made in the broader public interest,” The Globe and Mail reported, “The Conservatives called [the declaration] 'aspirational' and said it was a 'non-legally binding document that does not reflect customary international law nor change Canadian laws.'"

But indications came soon that the Liberal approach to UNDRIP would not be that much different than the Conservative approach.

In July, iPolitics reported, "Justice Minister Jody Wilson-Raybould called the adoption of [UNDRIP] into Canadian law 'unworkable' in a statement to the Assembly of First Nations. Wilson-Raybould, a member of the We Wai Kai Nation in B.C., described a cut-and-paste approach to making UNDRIP compatible with domestic laws an overly simplistic and untenable method of protecting indigenous rights in Canada."

This past summer, the Liberals also approved Navigation Protection Act and Fisheries Act permits to allow construction on the Site C dam on Treaty 8 territory in northeastern British Columbia despite not having the free, prior and informed consent of the directly affected West Moberly First Nation and the Prophet River First Nation.

The government has not taken action against the Alton Gas project in Nova Scotia even though the project tramples on the treaty and fishery rights of the Mi’kmaq community. The Assembly of Nova Scotia Mi’kmaq Chiefs has demanded that the project be stopped because "meaningful consultation has not taken place," and the project doesn’t have the free, prior and informed consent of the Sipekne'katik First Nation.

By September, the Trudeau government announced their approval of the Pacific NorthWest LNG project without the free, prior and informed consent of the hereditary leadership of the Lax Kw’alaams First Nation, whose territory the terminal would be built on. 

Federal environment minister Catherine McKenna stated, "Indigenous Peoples were meaningfully consulted, and where appropriate, impacts on their rights and interests were accommodated," but did not mention consent.

Earlier last week, The Globe and Mail reported that Natural Resources Minister Jim Carr said the federal government will not require consent from First Nations as it makes a decision on whether to approve Kinder Morgan Inc.’s Trans Mountain pipeline expansion.

Carr said that the Trudeau government believes it only needs to accommodate and consult First Nations before carrying out major resource development projects and not obtain “free prior and informed consent.”

In response, Kanesatake Grand Chief Serge Simon, who is a spokesperson for an anti-pipeline alliance supported by about 85 First Nations, commented, "New infrastructure to bring in more oil from the tar sands? Forget it, it’s not going to happen. I don’t care what Jim Carr says that no consent is necessary... Consent, it’s what we are demanding and he will never get our consent, not for something like this... What if we gave Canada 20 Standing Rocks? I wonder if his position will change then?" 

The Trans Mountain pipeline would impact the land and waters of several First Nations, including the Tsleil-Waututh Nation, while the Energy East pipeline would traverse the traditional territory of 180 Indigenous communities.

The Council of Canadians calls on the Trudeau government to respect and fully implement the United Nations Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

The council also asks the government to be consistent with Article 19 of UNDRIP and recommendation 43 in the Truth and Reconciliation Commission report, the Liberal government must respect the right to free, prior and informed consent.

We specifically call on the Trudeau government to reject the Trans Mountain pipeline, which is expected to be approved by Dec. 19.

Please chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Flickr/Peg Hunter

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.