rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Canada's plan to buy new fighter jets silent on $19.1 billion in sustainment costs

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Harjit Sajjan and Anita Vandenbeld/Wikimedia Commons

Earlier this year, the Royal Air Force reduced from 138 to 48 the number of F-35 fighter jets it will buy. There have been subsequent statements that additional F-35s could be ordered in 2025, but for now the order has been reduced by almost two-thirds.

Why?

On June 23, UK Defence Secretary Ben Wallace stated he wanted to see progress on controlling the maintenance costs for the F-35.

Wallace warned: "I'm not in the business of giving a blank check to contractors if they don't play their part in cost controls."

Now, the Government Accountability Office (GAO) in the United States says: "We recommended, among other things, that Congress consider making future F-35 acquisitions contingent on progress reducing sustainment costs."

U.S. Air Force officials have said that unless sustainment costs decrease, "the service's only available remaining options to meet the affordability constraints are to reduce the total number of F-35A aircraft they plan to purchase, or to reduce the aircraft's planned flying hours."

Those sustainment costs can be as high as $38,000 an hour.

Stars and Stripes further notes the U.S. plans to buy 2,500 F-35s with an estimated life cycle cost exceeding $1.7 trillion, of which $1.3 trillion of those costs are related to operating and sustaining the aircraft.

The GAO says that is a $150 billion increase over 2012 estimates.

Canada's plan to spend billions on fighter jets

To date, there have been no public statements from Canadian Defence Minister Harjit Sajjan about the sustainment costs of the F-35 fighter jet.

His government has said the purchase cost of a fleet of 88 new fighter jets will be between $15-19 billion but has not put a dollar figure on the sustainment costs. The Government of Canada's future fighter capability project website is silent on this crucial issue.

The No Fighter Jet coalition has estimated that $19.1 billion in sustainment costs should be added to the sticker price of new fighter jets.

Parliamentary Secretary to the defence minister Anita Vandenbeld has stated the selection of a fighter jet is anticipated in early 2022 and that the contract is expected to be awarded in late 2022. She has not indicated if or when there would be a public disclosure of the sustainment costs of the F-35 fighter jets or the other two aircraft under consideration.

A report by the Parliamentary Budget Officer could help to answer this question, but generally takes between three to six months to produce. That leaves little time in Sajjan and Vandenbeld's timeline for public disclosure and debate on the sustainment costs that the United States and the United Kingdom are now grappling with.

A blank cheque approach that focuses on the sticker cost of a fighter jet but not its sustainment costs may be related to the Government of Canada's stated intention to spend more than half-a-trillion dollars on the military over the next 20 years.

The promise is that the money will be there.

There is a fuller discussion to be had about the offensive capability of fighter jets, their environmental impacts, and the Indigenous lands on which they are stationed, but basic transparency on the billions to be spent on sustainment costs is also needed.

With an election call expected as early as August 9, the question of sustainment costs is likely to be asked first on the campaign trail than in the House of Commons.

Brent Patterson is the executive director of Peace Brigades International-Canada. You can follow them at @PBIcanada.

Image: Harjit Sajjan and Anita Vandenbeld/Wikimedia Commons

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.