rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

The betrayal of the Left

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Please support our coverage of democratic movements and become a supporter of rabble.ca.

At a time when the NDP is leading in many of the recent polls, I have simultaneously become increasingly disillusioned with the party (I was never a card carrying member of the party, but certainly an intellectual fellow traveller) as well as with the left in general in Canada. In recent years, I have asked myself what it means to be a leftie in Canada, and that question has been on my mind considerably more in recent weeks.

This feeling has come to the fore more recently with the NDP's recent declaration and full support of balanced budgets. Indeed, they have vowed, if elected, to bring in a balanced budget within the first year of office, a position that is far more stringent than the Harper government's own policy. In times of recession and slow growth, this is the wrong policy to adopt. I would even say that it is never a good policy.

The danger of this position is even more absurd when you wonder what the NDP would have done had they been in office in 2007 when the crisis broke out? We know that, empirically, the fiscal expansionary policies that were followed in the few years after the beginning of the crisis stabilized the great downward GDP spiral. We can argue that the money was misspent in some instances or that more was needed, as witnessed by our mediocre growth performance since then, but overall, deficit spending succeeded when it was needed.

By the NDP's own admission, deficits are a burden on future generations and they are inflationary. Would they then have stood firm and refused to help the Canadian economy and Canadian workers? Of course, the party will never publicly comment on this as they know their position would raise serious credibility issues. But Canadians deserve to know if the NDP would consider deficit spending if the economy sunk into another severe recession or crisis. My guess is that they would not given we were in recession in the first half of the year and the NDP is campaigning on immediate balanced budgets.

At first, of course, I thought the party's new austerian position was opportunistic and reflected a betrayal of the party's core philosophy and of the party members. But now I am not so sure. In reading the many replies I received on past blogs criticizing the NDP's austerian ways, I was dumbstruck at how many party members -- so-called lefties -- were against deficits. Now I am left with the impression that the NDP's position is not a betrayal at all, but may simply reflect the members' thinking. Maybe there was some deep internal polling done on this question, and the party seized the moment. Who knows.

It does lead, however, to a greater question of what it means to be a leftie today. We see this deep betrayal around the world, really. In France, for instance, the "socialists" are more to the right than Sarkosy's UMP. We are told this is the new way, that we had "better get with the music" if we ever want to be elected again. In the UK, many on the left are now giving up on ever gaining power under the "radical" Jeremy Corbyn. Many of my so-called American leftie friends tell me that Bernie Sanders would kill the Democratic Party's chances of keeping the White House. 

But why? Why abandon some of the key policies for power? Why would citizens want to elect a left-wing party that behaves like the right when they can just vote for the party on the right?

For me, the definition of the left begins with the role of the state and in its ability to be transformative. It starts with the concept of functional finance, the notion that fiscal spending must achieve the social and economic goals set by government and its citizens, such as full employment. If deficits result, so be it. There are no credible studies that show that deficits are a bad thing. Let me repeat this: there are no credible studies that show deficits have adverse effects on the economy. Quite the contrary, good deficits (more on good vs bad deficits in another post) have a tremendously positive impact on the economy, both in the short term and the long term.

But deficits have become such a dirty word; and that has been the right's greatest victory: to convince Canadians that deficits are bad, that they are a burden on future generations, that they are inflationary, that they threaten our welfare. None of this is true, of course, and there is plenty of evidence to support this. But it is difficult to convince Canadians, and even people on the so-called left, of the merits of this alternative way of thinking. It served us well in the decades following WWII, although this message was lost with the rise of Thatcher and Reagan, and the world has not been the same since. 

I am amazed when I talk to my barber, my grocer, my taxi driver. They are all against deficits saying that the state should live within its means. After all, if we can't, neither should the state. But this is a ridiculous argument, to which I will return in another blog post. 

The left is starting to wake up, and this has been made evident by the wonderful manifesto by Naomi Klein. It is worth the wait, and hopefully will be met my more voices joining the fight of the True Left.

Please support our coverage of democratic movements and become a supporter of rabble.ca.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.