rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

A national child care program: Not now, after all

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Four more years.....

For those of you who -- like me -- believe that a national approach is necessary if Canadian families are ever going to win high quality accessible early childhood services, the federal election results are a bitter pill to swallow. There is no doubt that the 2006 cancellation of the hard-won bilateral Early Learning and Care agreements by the minority Conservative government set child care back five years. Now, with a majority government with a reluctant attitude to early childhood education and child care in place for a four year fixed term, careful strategic thinking about challenges and opportunities is more important than ever.

Some preliminary thoughts to generate debate:

We in the child care movement should be proud of our achievements

While we haven't won the Canada-wide national child care program we have been seeking since the 1970s, much has been achieved. Early childhood education and care (ECEC) has become a mainstream issue, desired by young parents and supported by the public and by many policymakers and allies gained in the last decade or so. The prominence of child care in the 2011 election is one illustration of this: Code Blue for Child Care pointed out in an election platform report card that four of the five main parties (supported by a majority of voters) were clear child care supporters.

Child care program election rally While aversion to child care may be hard to take in 2011, it's really nothing new. In fact, absent government appetite (both federally and provincially/territorially) for improving the lives of families and children has been the reality for much of the last thirty years of child care advocacy. A pragmatic long-term appraisal shows that -- in spite of the fragile situation of Canadian ECEC -- much has been achieved that provides a solid underpinning for ongoing advocacy.


Now is the time to build solidarity

Solidarity and coalition-building has long been a strength of the Canadian child care movement with its unique history of cross-sectoral solidarity among feminist, labour, social justice, education and child care groups, researchers and advocates.

Last spring, early childhood policy expert Helen Penn -- writing in a British ECEC magazine about an Ottawa early childhood policy forum she attended -- noted the "optimism and energy" when "the outlook is bleak and the likelihood of change is minimal." She pointed to the considerable collegiality and camaraderie across sectors, experience and age-cohorts and the "inspiring level of discussion" as encouragement for UK ECEC advocates.

Post-2011 election is a good time to keep in mind our tradition of solidarity, and to build on it in new ways.

Making gains at multiple levels of government

The Canadian child care movement has always been both "pan-Canadian" and "provincial/ territorial", focusing on both senior levels of government as is necessary given the mechanics of Canadian federalism. While the federal government is key in ensuring that social programs touch all regions of Canada, provinces/territories are of fundamental importance as they hold the jurisdictional responsibility for social programs.

Current interest across Canada among (some) provinces/territories in ECEC offers multiple possibilities -- as well as challenges -for strengthened cross-Canada advocacy and making gains in the short term.

Using the available assets

The new Parliament of 2011 may be lead by an ECEC-averse majority government but boasts an empowered NDP Official Opposition with a long history of vigorous child care advocacy; a Liberal caucus which, though weakened, has considerable multi- election experience with ECEC as a leading issue; and a first-time seat win for the Green Party. At the same time, the Canadian Labour Congress -- a leading partner in child care advocacy -- has adopted a powerful resolution and commitment at its May Convention to campaign and work with child care movement partners towards "non-profit, public, high quality, accessible, inclusive, and affordable" child care.

These -- together with provincial/territorial interest, a child care movement with a thirty year history, public support for ECEC as a mainstream issue and our own well-developed policy positions -- are significant assets.

Keep in mind what we stand for... and why

Child care debate in Canada has long been based on well-defined advocacy principles: ECEC should be treated as universal, not targeted; it should be well supported with public funding; the ECEC "system" should be made up of not-for-profit and public programs; a well-paid, well-educated, well-respected workforce is fundamental to a high quality ECEC system; "education" and "care" should form a "strong and equal partnership"; and democratic principles such as inclusion, respect for diversity and democratic participation should underpin a Canadian ECEC system. Historically, government policy development has been challenged, informed and extended by the policy development of the child care movement.

Over the years, the rationales for our basic child care advocacy principles have been strengthened through research, analysis and observation. While refining, evolving, and adapting to change have been -- and should continue to be -- ongoing, this would be a good time to reaffirm our basic principles and commitments, keeping in mind how and -- especially -- why we arrived at them in the first place

Going forward

Over the next few months, the broad "we" who make up the Canadian child care movement will be discussing these and other ideas with our colleagues - as well as with those who are less supportive (and even those who are not supportive at all) as we figure out what the next four years holds.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.