rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Supreme Court rules in favour of Clyde River Inuit, against Chippewas of the Thames First Nation

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Image: Flickr/Environmental Defence Canada

Today, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled unanimously that the Clyde River Inuit were not adequately consulted as part of the National Energy Board approval of an energy project that would impact their territories and threaten their culture.

A five-year oil exploration project in Baffin Bay and Davis Strait (off Clyde River's coast) had been approved by the National Energy Board (NEB) without proper consultation. This project would use seismic blasting -- a process of firing loud sound explosions through the ocean to find oil -- as a first step towards dangerous Arctic oil drilling. Oil industry activities like seismic blasting seriously threaten Inuit food security by putting at risk the Arctic animals they depend on for their very survival. Three years ago, Clyde River filed a legal challenge against the seismic companies, the NEB, and the federal government for failure to consult. Today, the Supreme Court ruled in their favour.

The ruling more clearly defines what Indigenous consultation on proposed energy projects will look like and will shape the future of energy development in Canada.

Reacting to the news Jerry Natanine, a community leader and former mayor of Clyde River, said: "I'm truly grateful to the Supreme Court for this ruling, which protects my community and the marine animals on which we depend from seismic blasting. This ruling will also help protect Indigenous rights and voices, and hopefully shield others from what we've been through. Like all people, we want economic opportunities to flow into our communities. But we know that we are part of the land, and an economy that destroys the earth destroys ourselves."

The Supreme Court of Canada ruled that while the National Energy Board (NEB) process can be a vehicle for consultation for the Crown to act and can determine whether the Crown's duty to Consult has been fulfilled, the Crown's duty was not fulfilled in this case and that when the NEB fails to fulfill its duty, the NEB must withhold project approval.

Unfortunately, the Court also ruled that the Chippewas of the Thames First Nation was adequately consulted on Enbridge's Line 9 pipeline reversal project which transports tar sands diluted bitumen through the First Nation's territory near London, Ontario.

The Council of Canadians does not agree with the Supreme Court's ruling that "The NEB sufficiently assessed the potential impacts on the rights of Indigenous groups and found that the risk of negative consequences was minimal and could be mitigated"  Expert testimony from a pipeline safety expert put the risk of a serious spill at 90 per cent. The Husky oil spill in Saskatchewan last summer showed just how inadequate the industry's "emergency responses" are. Despite ideal conditions, the response was unable to mitigate the consequences of a relatively small volume rupture which travelled hundreds of kilometers downstream, forcing communities to turn off their water treatment plants for weeks.    

We call on the Government of Canada to respect its commitment to uphold the rights of Indigenous peoples by implementing the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples.

Read more about the Council of Canadians' work in solidarity with Clyde River and Chippewas of the Thames.

Image: Flickr/Environmental Defence Canada

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.


Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.