You may have heard the news that the Federal Court of Appeal will soon hear six legal challenges to the approval of the Trans Mountain pipeline project. The challenges will once again focus on the "consultation" with Indigenous peoples directly impacted by this project.
Before taking power in 2015, Justin Trudeau promised his government would not only consult First Nations, but would obtain consent from communities before projects like this one could proceed.
There has never been clear consent for the Trans Mountain pipeline.
The Federal Court has already ruled once that public consultation for this 1,150 kilometre pipeline expansion, which would take bitumen from the tar sands in Alberta to British Columbia for export, was inadequate, and it overturned the original approval for the project.
The federal government is now the owner of the pipeline thanks to the use of more than $4.5 billion of public money -- with another $9.3 billion expected to be spent on construction costs -- and just started a second consultation process in June. But when the government announced it was approving the pipeline project again, Indigenous peoples argued that the outcome of that consultation was predetermined; they say the government, as owner of the pipeline, has a financial interest that overshadows the public interest.
We should all ask: what is adequate consultation? When has consent been given? Should consultation that simply gathers the feedback people provide be accepted, or does the government have a responsibility to act when impacted Indigenous nations say no?
These legal appeals are examples of the lengths Indigenous peoples need to go to prove their rights are being trampled and how difficult it is to hold the government and corporations accountable to the law. On the flip side, land and water defenders are being unjustly jailed and fined for simply voicing their dissent. This is a double standard of law enforcement that is difficult to reconcile.
The court ordered the legal challenges be heard quickly and rulings are expected within months.
Thanks to the generous support of people like you, the Council of Canadians is working in solidarity with Indigenous peoples and concerned people and their communities to stop this pipeline.
We need a better, sustainable future for current and future generations.
Dylan Penner and Robin Tress are campaigners with the Council of Canadians. This article originally appeared on their blog.
Image: Chris Yakimov/Flickr
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.