rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Day 8: Canada's Kyoto position exposed for what it is

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Kyoto Protocol news:

As UN climate talks continue in Durban, South Africa, Canada's reputation continues its downward spiral. As highlighted in earlier blogs, Canada's position on not signing a second commitment period under the Kyoto Protocol hinges on the argument that we need one deal that includes all major polluters.

According to CBC and other news outlets, China is bringing forward a proposal to agree to binding emission cuts under the Kyoto Protocol. Great news right? How many times has Minister Kent pointed the finger at China as why Canada won't sign a second commitment period (too many to count). Minister Kent's response to China's announcement? While they want to see the details, Kent has already stated that it won't affect Canada's position on not signing a second commitment period. Why? Because Canada's position isn't about getting all players under one deal. As I've stated before, it is about the advancement of a weak single international agreement with voluntary targets and more loopholes building on the Copenhagen/Cancun framework.

Thankfully, the Canadian Youth Delegation were prepared to respond in Durban and crashed Minister Kent's press conference in their snazzy bitu-men's wear corporate suits. Check out their photo stream here.

Too little, too late?

There is a lot of chatter at the talks about 2015 and 2020 as the timeline we'll see an agreement on climate change emerge (guess which date the Harper government is banking on). Don't worry, you aren't the only one feeling a bit of déjà-vu. Remember the whole build up to the Copenhagen climate talks? The ads, the news coverage, the 100,000 person march? Remember the prediction that 2010 was THE year for a new climate deal? This certainly doesn't instil a lot of hope in these talks, particularly given the weak commitments and loopholes (like expanding the carbon market to include soil/agriculture and more carbon offsets) being negotiated. Meanwhile, climate science continues to evolve and point to climate change unfolding at an even quicker pace than predicted, leading many of us questioning whether we are reaching a climate tipping point when we are faced with irreversible consequences of our governments irresponsibility.

Hitting the streets: System change not climate change

While there has been little forward movement inside the talks, people hit the streets in Durban and around the world for a global day of action on December 3. In Durban, a number of Canadians came together in a delegation in the march carrying a Canadian maple leaf symbol with a pipeline and smoke stake on it. In Canada (to name a few events,) there was a teach-in in Toronto featuring speakers and videos followed by a march in solidarity with Occupy Toronto, there was a System Change not Climate Change rally in Vancouver and rally on the stairs of Parliament in Edmonton.

The messages of the these movements are critical and are far more in tune with what our communities need and what is needed to address the crisis of climate change. We know what needs to be done. There are plenty of solutions available to us (I highlighted a number in my first Durban blog). Some cost little and are easily implemented, some will require serious investments and will lead to broader changes.

While staying on this path may seem easier in the short-term (change in all forms can be challenging) and certainly ensures healthy profits for Big Oil which invests heavily in anti-climate science campaigns, the reality is that not dealing with this problem will be far worse (if you don't believe me, read James Hansen's latest book, or follow Nature science journals).

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.