rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Climate change safeguarded in TPP environment chapter

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Image: DonkeyHotey/flickr

You can change the conversation. Chip in to rabble's donation drive today!

Wikileaks has again pierced through the cloak of secrecy protecting ongoing U.S.-led Trans-Pacific Partnership trade negotiations, to which Canada is one of 12 participating countries. In November, they released the controversial intellectual property rights chapter showing country positions on patents, copyright, trademarks and Internet rules. Yesterday, Wikileaks published (and dismissed as nearly useless) a November 24 version of the TPP's Environment chapter.

"When compared against other TPP chapters, the Environment Chapter is noteworthy for its absence of mandated clauses or meaningful enforcement measures," says a Wikileaks media release. "The dispute settlement mechanisms it creates are cooperative instead of binding; there are no required penalties and no proposed criminal sanctions. With the exception of fisheries, trade in 'environmental' goods and the disputed inclusion of other multilateral agreements, the Chapter appears to function as a public relations exercise."

A report from negotiating chairs about the consolidated text, also leaked, says the chapter attempts "to balance the need for ambitious obligations in a trade agreement to protect and conserve the environment with the keen interest from some Parties to include substantive commitments to cooperate on specific topics. On this issue, the consolidated text sets out ambitious obligations while providing for flexibility and cooperation where helpful to assist Parties in implementing these obligations."

A bit too much flexibility, probably. In many ways, the approach to environmental protection in the TPP, based on this leak, would mirror weak commitments and almost non-existent enforcement options in NAFTA's environmental side agreement. A Commission for Environmental Cooperation established under NAFTA to monitor and police its environmental commitments has been powerless to stop the weakening of environmental legislation in Canada as part of Harper's efforts to attract investment in oil, gas and mining projects.

Of all TPP negotiating countries, only the U.S. is prepared to subject environmental disputes to the "same arbitral tribunal process as the obligations found elsewhere in the TPP," says the report. "This includes the resort to the application of trade sanctions in cases where compliance with an arbitral panel ruling is not achieved." Canada has pushed back successfully against similar European requests to included multilateral environmental agreements in the Sustainable Development chapter of the Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).

Jane Kelsey, a trade and investment expert and professor at Auckland University, has analyzed the leaked Environment Chapter for Wikileaks. She writes:

Instead of a 21st century standard of protection, the leaked text shows that the obligations are weak and compliance with them is unenforceable. Contrast that to other chapters that subordinate the environment, natural resources and indigenous rights to commercial objectives and business interests. The corporate agenda wins both ways.

Those chapters include one on investment protection, with an investor-to-state dispute settlement process pulled from NAFTA that gives companies extraordinary rights to challenge environmental measures that undermine their profits. Governments will have no comparable powers in the TPP to make sure multinational corporations are abiding by environmental commitments (e.g. to remediate industrial sites). In fact, the TPP environment chapter encourages voluntary mechanisms to enhance environmental performance (section 9) and voluntary corporate social responsibility programs (section 8).

All of this just exposes the obvious: the TPP is not an environmental protection agreement but another, much more elaborate compact for policing corporate globalization. Governments are prohibited from interfering with trade and investment flows. When they or their corporations disrupt ecosystems or continue to dump carbon into the atmosphere their only punishment is a lengthy consultation.

The Council of Canadians is one of more than 30 organizations participating in a January 31 Intercontinental Day of Action against the TPP and Corporate Globalization. For more information, or to volunteer to plan an action in your community, visit www.tinyurl.com/tradejustice.

Like this article? Chip in to keep stories like these coming!

Image: DonkeyHotey/flickr

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.