rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

New report outlines the threat of CETA's corporate rights protections

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

The Council of Canadians and more than a dozen European and Canadian organizations simultaneously released a new report that looks at the threat posed by the controversial investor protection rules in the proposed Canada-EU Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA).

The report, Trading Away Democracy: How CETA's investment protection rules threaten the public good in Canada and the EU, warns that expansive new protections in the agreement's investment chapter -- including the investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) mechanism similar to NAFTA's Chapter 11 -- could "unleash a corporate litigation boom against Canada, the EU and individual EU member states, and could dangerously thwart government efforts to protect citizens and the environment."

While CETA's proponents argue that negotiators have introduced a number of so-called reforms to ISDS, which allows corporations to directly sue countries for policies or measures that interfere with their "legitimate expectations" of profit, the report finds that CETA "would arguably grant even greater rights to foreign investors than NAFTA" and that future government policy will be constrained if CETA is ratified.

For Canada, the report points to new risks posed by CETA's expansive new corporate rights in the financial sector, which go far beyond NAFTA's existing disciplines in the banking and insurance industries. "The risks for Canada of being sued by banks, insurers and holding companies will increase significantly with CETA. These risks are evident as speculative investors, backed by investment lawyers, are increasingly using investment arbitration to scavenge for profits by suing governments in financial crises. Also, most investment is coming to Canada from exactly those EU countries where investors are notorious claimants in investor-state disputes: the Netherlands and the UK."

The report also warns that European investors -- which are the second largest source of foreign direct investment (FDI) in Canada, with $180.9 billion in investments in 2012 accounting for a quarter of all FDI into Canada -- are the most frequent users of ISDS globally. Of the 568 known cases of investor-state challenges, European-based investors have launched 299 of them, or over half of all investor-state challenges. US investors, which have already cost Canadian taxpayers over C$170 million in NAFTA challenges to date and are currently seeking billions more, account for an additional 127 of the know ISDS cases.

In other words, if CETA is ratified Canada will have expansive investor protection rights agreements with countries that account for three-quarters of all challenges, putting public interest policy at risk from the federal to the municipal level.

Trading Away Democracy warns that the European Union is also taking a major risk with CETA's investment protection rules. It found that EU regulations in the mining and oil and gas sectors -- where Canadian investment in Europe is significant -- are at particular risk of challenge by Canadian-based mining corporations. More than one in three known ISDS cases worldwide are already related to mining, oil and gas projects. Canadian mining companies, which have earned a global reputation as "far and away the worst offenders in environmental, human rights and other abuses around the world" are already engaged in a number of controversial projects in the EU which are facing still opposition from local residents and environmentalists.

CETA will also act as a Trojan Horse in Europe for U.S. multinational corporations with subsidiaries in Canada, which will be able to use their "substantial business interests" to launch challenges against EU regulations. This is of particular concern for Europeans given the high level of foreign ownership in the Canadian economy, where almost 40 per cent of all large enterprises are foreign owned. Almost 60 per cent of annual foreign investment in Canada from 1985 to 2014 was from the US.

CETA would also allow Canadian corporations with a presence in Europe, such as Bombardier, and European corporations with Canadian arms, including Shell and BP, to sue their own governments over measures that interfere with their profits.

Increasing opposition to ISDS, most notably in Europe, has been met by the Canadian government and European Commission with a misleading propaganda drive focused on the cosmetic reforms that CETA has made to investment protections in the proposed agreement. With the September 26 release of the final agreement being presented to citizens of both sides of the Atlantic as a fait accompli (subject to minor "adjustments" during the legal review which is expected to take most of 2015 to complete), the report concludes by calling on legislators in Canada, the EU and European member states to reject any CETA text which includes investor-state arbitration.

Download the full report or the executive summary.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.