rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

NAFTA panel could rule on investor-state challenge targeting Ontario this month

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Photo: Council of Canadians

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Billionaire T. Boone Pickens is suing Canada through the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) for $700 million in future lost profit.

The New York Times explains, "[In 2011] the province of Ontario granted [Florida-based] NextEra $3.8 billion in energy contracts. [Pickens and his Texas-based wind power company] Mesa Power contends that $18,600 in donations that NextEra made to the ruling Liberal Party in Ontario before elections in 2011 had undue influence on the auction. Mesa Power's notice of arbitration also includes allegations of favoritism toward two Korean companies, Samsung C&T and Korea Electric Power Corp., that entered a separate energy deal with the [provincial] government."

In terms of additional background, the newspaper notes, "When Ontario enacted a Green Energy Act in 2009, both Mesa Power and NextEra saw an opportunity. As part of its policy change, the government created a program to provide incentives for companies to invest in renewable energy projects. Companies that were awarded contracts would be paid premium guaranteed prices set by the government."

"Mesa Power submitted several project proposals through the program. But when the first rankings came out in late 2010, its executives disputed the assessments, arguing that Mesa Power's projects should have been higher. Ontario government officials have countered that Mesa Power did not submit its applications properly. ...Mesa Power later disputed an auction in the spring of 2011, complaining of a lack of transparency around the process of awarding contracts and insufficient time for public consultation. ...The same month that the government rejected his projects in 2011, Pickens took his case to an international tribunal, a forum where the judges are appointed by both parties in the case and a judgment can't be appealed."

The Huffington Post adds, "The suit also claims the Ontario government imposed a variety of 'prohibited' buy-local rules, which the suit says violates NAFTA rules." In December 2012 and May 2013, Ontario lost World Trade Organization (WTO) rulings that found that the "domestic content" requirements in the Green Energy Act discriminated against foreign-owned firms and were a violation of trade agreements. By December 2013, Ontario's energy minister had announced the province would no longer require renewable energy developers to use local suppliers.

Both the Canada-European Union Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) and the recently negotiated Trans-Pacific Partnership contain an investor-state dispute settlement (ISDS) similar in nature to the Chapter 11 ISDS provision in the North American Free Trade Agreement.

In January 2015, a study by the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives found that Canada is the most-sued country under NAFTA. Thirty-five claims have been made against Canada, while 22 were brought against Mexico and 20 against the United States. Canada has lost or settled six of those claims, Mexico has lost five cases, while the United States has won 11 and lost none. The Huffington Post notes, "About 63 per cent of the claims against Canada involved challenges to environmental protection or resource management programs that allegedly interfere with the profits of foreign investors."

The NAFTA panel is expected to rule on Pickens' claim this month.

For more on our trade campaign, please click here.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.