rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Senate report on pipelines steeped in old-school energy ideas

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Flickr/Chris Yakimov

This week the Canadian Senate committee on transportation and communication released a report on fossil fuel transportation, and much like the recent approval of the Kinder Morgan pipeline, it was unsatisfying on many levels. 

First and foremost the fact that this committee even had a mandate to “examine and report on the development of a strategy to facilitate the transport of crude oil” is shameful. This is morally and logically reprehensible, given that cutting carbon emissions should be a federal priority. 

I would have rather seen a committee looking for strategies to facilitate a just transition to a renewable economy with public power-generation ownership or a report on worker re-training opportunities for oil industry workers trying to move to sustainable fields.

I would like to have seen a report on an investment plan to update Canada’s electricity grids to be able to manage variable renewable energy inputs or a report on policy priorities to remove barriers for renewable energy uptake.

Any of those would have been a joy to see and participate in, but not this out-of-date report.

The report opens with an Einstein quote, “The world as we have created it is a process of our thinking. It cannot be changed without changing our thinking.”

The irony of this choice of quote is representative of our government’s and largely our society’s inability to imagine existence beyond fossil fuels. 

The thinking behind this committee -- that relying on fossil fuel companies is the only way to create energy for our communities and the only way to have a strong economy -- has not changed. It is the exact same thinking that was behind the global climate crisis we are now experiencing. 

Secondly, the recommendations of this report specifically push to extend the Energy East pipeline to the Point Tupper terminal in Nova Scotia beyond the currently planned Saint John, NB terminus.

Energy East is not good for communities’ water, safety, climate or economy, no matter where it ends, so extending the pipeline to Nova Scotia is similarly unacceptable.

Additionally, from a public process perspective, this recommendation goes against the concept of public participation in the National Energy Board review process.

The NEB does not provide perfect opportunities for public input (read more on that here and here) but it is anti-democratic for politicians and senators to not discuss this extension in a serious way with the public through a regulated process like the NEB.

The Energy East extension must be immediately included in the NEB review of Energy East and be subject to public scrutiny and comment if it is seriously being considered by TransCanada, the Government of Nova Scotia or NuStar (the company that owns the Point Tupper terminal).

The committee and several hearing participants -- including Nova Scotia’s Minister of Energy Michel Samson and the province’s Progressive Conservative Leader Jamie Baillie -- presented the Energy East extension as a more environmentally friendly option for Energy East, because the Bay of Fundy is too high-risk for bitumen export. 

Their argument amounts to, “if it has to go somewhere, it shouldn’t be the bay with the highest tides in the world.” The new thinking we need would rebut that idea with “we don’t need it at all.”   

Check out these links to learn more about how the Council is working against Energy East across Canada and in Atlantic Canada specifically.

Like this article? Please chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.