On Tuesday we went before the Police Ethics Committee to ask that I be involved in my own complaint against the police. I want to be able to ask directly who was giving the agents provocateurs in Montebello their orders.
The hearing was held in a small faceless courtroom, on the sixth floor of an office tower in downtown Montreal. The lawyers all wore nice dark suits. We had one lawyer. The SQ had three.
It's pretty clear that three years after we filed our complaint, the SQ complaints procedure is a bad joke.
When we first filed our complaint against the SQ it was thrown out by the Police Ethics Commissioner-that's right, thrown right out.
The Commissioner admitted that the three undercover cops were a bit pushy with me, but that that was OK under the circumstances.
We appealed, and the Ethics Committee ordered the same Commissioner who turned down our original complaint to proceed against the three officers. That means that the guy who didn't want to hear from me is now supposed to defend my interests.
Our lawyer Mike Cohen says any reasonable person would find this bizarre-how can the guy who turned down our complaint be relied on to dig up evidence that proves how wrong he was? That is why I should be directly involved as a third party intervenor. That would make the proceedings more credible.
Oh no no no, said the police and Commissioner's lawyers. If we allow Dave Coles to testify we would have to open the door to all kinds of distracting people and the proceedings would turn into a Chinese Buffet and could drag on and on, said the SQ lawyers.
But there is the matter of the Charter and issues of freedom of expression and association, said Cohen.
We all know that when the Charter is invoked it is because there is no case joked one of the SQ lawyers, while the other one chuckled sympathetically.
Making fun of the Charter apparently passes for humor among lawyers who work for the police.
As lawyers say, I would respectfully submit, that when you make fun of the Charter it is because you don't have a moral leg to stand on.
We now know the three masked SQ cops' names: Jean-Francois Boucher, Joey Laflamme and Patrick Tremblay. You can watch some of what they were up to on YouTube:
But I don't really have a big hate-on for "the three stooges" who were defending "the three amigos."
I do have something against the systematic use of provocateurs at all the summit protests in recent years, including the G20 in Toronto. I want to know who tells guys like Boucher, Laflamme and Tremblay that they should wreck our demonstrations, and discredit our right to protest.
Three years after the fact, and counting, who is giving the orders?
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.