rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Drugs, secrets, deaths and enemies

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

First, a little house keeping: This blog, transmitting out of stopwarblog.blogspot.com for two years now, is now being mirrored at rabble.ca. (Big thank you to the good people at rabble.) The format is still the same - an emphasis on aspects of the war that are not reported on the front pages coupled with a tendency to quote rather than summarize, yet also to draw in the facts as well as plenty of parallels and recollections. However, until I have figured out images for the rabble version, there may be more graphics at the blogspot version.

Today, rather unusually for this blog, we play catch-up with a series of info snatches:

More dead civilians
From Reuters reports on NATO's doings in Helmand (where British forces predominate in the NATO mission):

HELMAND, June 24 - An Afghan civilian was shot dead by a NATO-led patrol on Sunday after he ignored signals to stop while driving his car towards the patrol near Babaji district, the alliance said in a statement. (link)

NATO in Khost province (an American-run affair):

KHOST, June 24 - NATO troops shot dead an Afghan civilian in a car in Khost province in the southeast after the car failed to stop following a warning, the alliance said. (link)

And in the war in Pakistan:

US drones kill scores of people in Pakistan tribal region
Jeremy Page and Zahid Hussain - The Times

ISLAMABAD, June 25 - A US drone fired at least three missiles at a Taleban training camp in the Makeen area of the tribal region of South Waziristan on Tuesday morning, killing at least seven militants, including a commander called Niaz Wali, according to local officials.

Another drone then fired at least four missiles in the evening at a funeral prayer meeting for Wali, attended by hundreds of militants and local villagers, the officials said...

... estimates from local officials and residents for the two strikes combined ranged from 45 to 70.

Jalaluddin Mehsud, who lives near the area and knew many people at the funeral, told The Times that 67 people had been killed, including 18 civilians... (link)

Later reports say "more than 80 militants" died in the Waziristan incident but are vague about how many civilians were killed.

Harper government keeps costs secret
Canwest reports on the Harper government's approach to public relations:

In a significant policy shift, the Canadian government now believes that telling the country's taxpayers the future cost of the war in Afghanistan would be a threat to national security...

The Defence Department cited a national security exemption when it censored a request under Access to Information by the federal NDP for the military costs... (link)

Afghan public opinion is enemy number two
Pursuant to the previous post on this blog the other day: Greg Jaffe of the Washington Post reports on an American unit in Kunar province as it tries to win hearts and minds:

[The company commander] faces two enemies in Afghanistan. The most obvious is the Taliban, whose fighters lurk in the mountains along the border. The other is the overwhelming frustration that Afghans feel toward U.S. forces.

Eight years of airstrikes, civilian casualties and humiliating house-to-house searches have left the Afghan people deeply suspicious of the U.S. troops who are supposed to be protecting them... (link)

Jaffe's assessment of Afghan opinion echoes that of many other observers, especially Pamela Constable of the Washington Post, who wrote in February:

The additional 17,000 troops the Obama administration is preparing to send to Afghanistan will face both an aggressive, well-armed Taliban insurgency and an unarmed but equally daunting foe: public opinion... (link)

A slight change of course?
The US appears to be adjusting its disastrous drug war policy for Afghanistan. To call it a reversal, as Reuters does, seems a bit of an exaggeration, since under the new strategy they will still be pursuing drug lords, thus marking poppy growers as targets in counterinsurgency efforts.

U.S. Reverses Afghan Drug Policy, Eyes August Vote

TRIESTE, Italy, Jun 27 (Reuters) -- Washington is to dramatically overhaul its Afghan anti-drug strategy, phasing out opium poppy eradication, the U.S. envoy to Pakistan and Afghanistan told allies on June 27...

"We are not going to support crop eradication. We're going to phase it out," [Richard Holbrooke] he said. The emphasis would instead be on intercepting drugs and chemicals used to make them, and going after drug lords.

He said some crop eradication may still be allowed, but only in limited areas...

The head of the UN Office of Drugs and Crime, told Reuters the old U.S. eradication strategy had been "a sad joke."

"Sad because many, many Afghan policemen and soldiers...have been killed and only about 5,000 hectares were eradicated, about 3 percent of the volume," Antonio Maria Costa said... (link)

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.