rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Former Conservative Cabinet Minister Chuck Strahl very likely violating federal ethics law

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Today, Democracy Watch has filed a complaint letter with federal Conflict of Interest and Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson requesting that she launch an inquiry into former Conservative Cabinet minister Chuck Strahl’s activities as the Chair of the Security Intelligence Review Committee (SIRC) since June 2012, and his work with Enbridge and other clients since he left Cabinet in May 2011.

As the complaint letter details, the federal Conflict of Interest Act (the “Act”) requires public office holders to arrange their private affairs to “prevent” conflicts of interest.  Democracy Watch’s opinion is that Mr. Strahl’s work with Enbridge while being Chair of SIRC while CSIS is investigating opponents of Enbridge’s proposed Northern Gateway pipeline causes conflicts of interest, it does not prevent them.

The Act also prohibits former Cabinet ministers, for two years after they leave the government, from working for or making representations to any entity across Canada (federal, provincial, territorial or municipal) with which they had significant official dealings during their last year in office.

Enbridge directly lobbied Mr. Strahl on April 29, 2010, and was registered to lobby the two departments he headed during his last year in office.  Democracy Watch’s opinion is that, as a result, Mr. Strahl was prohibited from working with Enbridge until May 18, 2013 (two years after he left office).  Mr. Strahl has confirmed that he has done work for Enbridge since 2011.

The Act also prohibits former Cabinet ministers, staff and appointees from ever giving advice using secret information they learned on the job, and from ever acting for any entity that is involved with any federal government proceeding or negotiation about which they advised the government.

Democracy Watch’s opinion is that given Enbridge was lobbying Mr. Strahl’s departments, and continues to lobby the government, including on the pipeline issue, and given that Mr. Strahl was a Cabinet minister from B.C., Mr. Strahl likely advised the federal government in some way on the pipeline negotiations, and Mr. Strahl must be using secret information he learned as a Cabinet minister, or is learning as Chair of SIRC, when giving advice to Enbridge.

In other words, Democracy Watch’s opinion is that Mr. Strahl is prohibited by the Act from acting as an advisor to Enbridge or any other entity that has an interest in federal government decision-making processes that Mr. Strahl advised the government about or about which Mr. Strahl likely knows confidential information.

“Enbridge’s past lobbying of Chuck Strahl and ongoing lobbying of the federal government, and his past and ongoing work for Enbridge while he is the chair of SIRC, adds up to a situation that Democracy Watch believes violates several rules in the federal conflict of interest law,” said Duff Conacher, Board member of Democracy Watch.

The big question is whether the Ethics Commissioner will take any action given that her spokesperson has already publicly stated that the Commissioner has “no grounds to believe” that Mr. Strahl’s activities and roles violate the Act, and given the Ethics Commissioner’s very weak enforcement attitude, approach and record since she was appointed in July 2007.

“There is enough clear evidence for Ethics Commissioner Mary Dawson to launch an inquiry into Mr. Strahl’s activities, so will she act like a watchdog and investigate or will she continue her weak lapdog enforcement record by failing, as she has more than 80 times in the past six years, to investigate and rule publicly about possible violations of the federal ethics law?” asked Conacher.

Democracy Watch also called on the House Ethics Committee to ensure it strongly recommends more than 30 key changes in its soon-to-be-released report reviewing the federal Conflict of Interest Act, including the most important change of closing loopholes and adding a new rule to make it clear that federal Cabinet ministers, staff and appointees are prohibited from taking part in any discussion or decision-making process when they have an appearance of a conflict of interest (this is the standard that all federal government employees are required to comply with under their ethics code and conflict of interest policy).

See details here, and if you want to help win stronger government ethics rules and enforcement, please send your letter calling for key changes now by clicking here

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.