rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Ernie Regehr: 'Peace can't be won on the battlefield'

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Ernie Regehr says peace cannot be won on the battlefield

rabble is expanding our Parliamentary Bureau and we need your help! Support us on Patreon today! 

Keep Karl on Parl

Ernie Regehr has been studying war and promoting peace since the 1960s. A tireless researcher, he has just produced another book called Disarming Conflict: Why Peace Cannot Be Won on the Battlefield. It would make good reading for new ministers as Canada's recently elected government contemplates changes to our defence and foreign policy.

Reviewed 100 armed conflicts

Regehr was a co-founder in 1976 of Project Ploughshares, the ecumenical peace research group based in Waterloo, and he served as its executive director for 30 years. He says the organization tracked armed conflicts since prior to 1989 and he has used that research to review almost 100 of them. "The lesson from 25 years of research is that conflicts aren't settled on the battlefield but they rely on addressing the economic and governance issues that give rise to conflict," he told me in a recent interview.

He added, "I am not just making a moral, ideological argument against trying to settle arguments by dint of force. I am saying that the evidence shows that it is virtually impossible to do it."

Regehr insists that resources devoured by the military would be invested more wisely in what he calls the four Ds: development, democracy, disarmament, and diplomacy. "We underfund those things and focus way too much attention on military responses to conflict," he says.

Military forces spend $14 billion every three days, which is more than the entire annual budget of the United Nations for all of its activities, including peacekeeping. In 2014-15, Canada spent $20 billion on defence, close to one per cent of GDP.

Protecting the vulnerable

Regehr does not rule out the use of "coercive enforcement" to protect vulnerable populations and restore stability. These should be multilateral interventions, usually under the auspices of the United Nations, and to succeed they must be "in support of the full range of peace and security efforts." In the Syrian conflict, for example, safe havens for civilians could be created within the country but near the border with Turkey, and protected by a multinational military force.

ISIS an "outlier"

He admits that groups such as ISIS in Syria and Iraq and Boko Haram in Nigeria are outliers who challenge the existing "paradigm of conflict" -- an important observation given the recent deadly attacks in Beirut, Paris and elsewhere. Those groups, he says, are driven mainly by religious extremism. Their primary goal is not linked to settling political or economic grievances but rather to establishing a Caliphate.

"We must say with humility that we do not know how to solve some of these conflicts but, nevertheless, we are neglecting any attempts at negotiation and reconciliation. We can also say with pretty strong conviction that the bombing campaign is not going to prove effective. There is this extraordinary humanitarian catastrophe there for which there is very inadequate humanitarian response. That's where the effort ought to be."

New Liberal government

What is Regehr's advice as a new Canadian government revisits foreign and defence policies? "If you want to engage and to promote international peace and security," he says, "then you have got to engage in developing a means to respond to economic development, good governance and diplomatic capacity, and to control the arms with which wars are fought. Those are the means by which political conflicts are going to be resolved."

He points to the Nordic countries as examples of what can be done and includes the Netherlands and Denmark on his list. He says they spend as much on development and diplomacy as they do on the military, while in Canada the ratio is four or five to one in favour of military spending.

A shorter version of this piece was published as a blog entry with the United Church Observer on November, 16, 2015.

rabble is expanding our Parliamentary Bureau and we need your help! Support us on Patreon today! 

Keep Karl on Parl

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.