rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

COP15: After the demo and ... tangling with the Royal Society

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

So much has happened in the past three days it is has been impossible to blog. We have been trying to lobby, trying to inform the press, attending side events, organizing our own workshops, meeting old and new friends and allies and basically working from early morning until late at night, like virtually everyone else here.

Today of course was a highlight -- the demonstration for action organized by several hundred organizations from around the world. An estimated 80-100,000 people in the streets -- very varied and colourful crowd, calling for Climate Justice now! The march was so long it was impossible to walk from one end to the other, let alone find someone you were looking for. We had printed 5000 Stop Geoengineering stickers and I was able to distribute about 4000 of them during the march. They look like this:

But loads of people will blog about the demonstration -- and the arrests that ensued which i did not see -- and no-one will talk about what is happening in this meeting with regards to technology, so let me spend a bit of time on what has been happening there.

The Royal Society issued a report earlier this year on geonengineering which really helped to bring this set of technologies out from the margins and into the mainsteam of scientific and public policy debates on climate change. ETC Group at the time issued two controversial sets of commentaries on it, one before and one after. Neither was particularly appreciated by the august institution, which opened its press conference with a denunciation of our report laying out what we expected them to say. They were particularly offended at our insinuation that that the report would legitimize geoengineering research and end up making crackpot profiteers acceptable. Of course, that is exactly what has happened.

So here we are in Copenhagen and the Royal Society has teamed up with The Climate Fund (directed By Margaret Leinen, better known for her association with Climos, her son Dan Whaley's ocean fertilization firm), Jason Blackstock doing double duty for CIGI and IIASA and lead author of one of the most frightening geoengineering reports to date as well as the Stockholm Environmental Institute and IISD to host a series of three side events on different aspects of geoengineering. To my great surprise, I was invited to speak at one of them, an invitation I gladly accepted. Then I found out I only had 2 minutes to comment on the rather lengthy presentations by John Shepherd (on the science) and Jason Blackstock (on the governance aspects). The whole was chaired by the affable Oliver Morton who had praised the Royal Society report when it came out and now writes for the Economist. Guess that's the end of his byline!

It ain't easy to do battle with these guys and and I was called simplistic (publicly) and stupid (privately). I was however able to make my point that no real-world geoengineering experiments should be allowed to go ahead, especially not before some real international governance mechanisms were in place. I tried to explain why geoengineering was a bad idea, why it was sheer hubris to think we could actually "manage solar radiation" by putting sulphates in the stratosphere or sunshades in space. Difficult as it was though, I did appreciate the possibility of dialogue and frankly it was in private conversations after the event that I felt the most hostility. People in the audience seemed to share many of my concerns.

The next day however we (Silvia Ribeiro from ETC Mexico and I) had planned a workshop on geonegineering at the Klima Forum where the NGOs and the activists gather every day. Lo and behold, the whole gang walked in -- Shepherd, Leinen, Whaley, KPMG -- with their suitcases fully of glossy Royal Society reports. That was rather astonishing since the day before I had been told I could not distribute a two-page declaration that has been signed by 180 organizations from around the world in their workshop! However, we let them distribute it and a lively debate was had in a small jam-packed room of people wanting information about what geoengineering was all about. I am pretty sure it was the first time any of them had had such a close encounter with civil society activist types and certainly Silvia gave them a piece of her mind about how cloud whitening along the Pacific coast would be received by the people of Ecuador, Peru and Chile!

There is much much more to say -- most importantly perhaps was the G77 Chair's meeting with civil society groups yesterday. He -- a very well respected diplomat from Sudan Ambassador Lumumba -- who blasted the West and those NGOs who are not strong enough to blast their governments -- now on video. This is mostly about attempts inside the official process to kill the Kyoto Protocol and seed divisions between developing countries which so far has not been successful -- but that will have to be my next blog...

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.