rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Persistent Salutin story a business and journalistic crisis for the Globe

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Rick Salutin

Who canned Rick Salutin? And why?

For heaven's sake, this mystery is already shrouded in almost as much speculation as the disappearance of Judge Crater!

In fact, the widely reported demise of Salutin's Friday column in the Globe and Mail is yet to be confirmed by that august publication. A look at the Globe's website suggests that Salutin is still on board as a columnist.

Reports of Salutin's unwilling departure seem to have begun on Sept. 28 on Murray Dobbin's blog, which was reprinted here on rabble.ca. A few other websites catering to readers with progressive views have also noted the report. Now the not-so-progressive National Post has weighed in.

Dobbin suggested that the Globe's decision to drop Salutin's column was evidence of the "economic elite's betrayal of the country’s traditions and values." He proposes a boycott of the Globe until Salutin is reinstated.

David Beers, writing in The Tyee, said on Sept. 30 that the official reason for Salutin's departure is that he didn't fit in with the Globe's redesign, but that the real reason may have been the contents of his last two columns. The penultimate column argued Stephen Harper has been influenced by the anti-democratic teachings of Leo Strauss (which should come as no surprise to anyone who has been paying attention). The last mildly criticized extremist Toronto mayoral candidate Rob Ford.

Others have suggested that the 60-something Salutin was just too darned old for the Globe's latest, desperate attempt to win younger readers. He will be replaced in the spot by Irshad Manji, who at 42 is presumably what passes for youthful in the corner offices of major Canadian newspapers nowadays.

To me, the replacement of Salutin by a younger writer of a faintly progressive persuasion suggests that whatever happened, it was not so much because he offended Canada's "Quisling elite," but because Globe management grew tired of him for their own inscrutable reasons, as newspaper managers do now and then.

One supposes that if we knew for sure the Globe is still publishing Jim Stanford's always informative and thoroughly left wing economics column, we would understand more about Globe management’s motivations. Or maybe not.

The Globe itself, meanwhile, maintains a steely silence, saying nothing at all about Salutin's fate. Nor does there appear to have been anything heard from Salutin in the past few days. In the absence of any denial by either the Globe or Salutin, we have to assume Dobbin got it right. Bring on the boycott!

Readers may also have noted the timing of Salutin's reported departure just days after the unintentionally hilarious editorial published by the Globe on Sept. 10 lauding the multi-bazillionaire Thomson family for its deep commitment to publishing the bestest, most honestest, most wonderfulest journalism in the whole wide world.

At any rate, said the editorial, the latest hereditary Lord Thomson has "made it clear that his family will continue to respect the autonomy of these pages and the independence of Globe staff to pursue the finest, most accurate and reliable journalism available to Canadians."

Now, it seems to me that in the Salutin case, the Globe has both a business and a journalistic crisis on its hands.

On the business side, they have done again what newspapers have been doing over and over for 30 years, to wit, dumped a feature liked by many existing readers in hopes of attracting new, younger, richer readers who are not engaged by newspapers just at this moment. The net effect has been to drive away loyal readers while failing to attract the hoped-for new ones.

If the Globe's bosses, the young Lord Thomson included, were as smart as they'd like us to think, they'd find a way to bring back Salutin if only to pacify their few remaining lefty readers. Sort of like the return of Coke Classic. The chances of this are small, however. As King Solomon, who was reputed to be quite wise, once rightly observed: "Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall."

On the journalistic side, they find themselves at the middle of a news story, one that they no doubt wish would go away. Alas for them, these things never do. When the media is hounding you, sound public relations advice calls for the publication of a clear statement explaining everything frankly, including the unpleasant parts.

This goes for newspapers, just like any other enterprise. The Globe should remember that if Richard Nixon had owned up to everything the morning after the Watergate burglars were arrested, chances are he would have completed his term as U.S. president.

Accurate and reliable journalism of the sort David Thomson has promised to permit is what's needed to solve the Globe's problem.

The time has come for the Globe to issue a statement that clears the air. If they won't do that, they deserve a boycott, although I'm not sure it would be worth the trouble. Most of us haven't bought a copy of their lousy paper in months.

If you want to get them where it really hurts, delete their app from your iPhone.

This post also appears on the nearly-60-something David Climenhaga's blog, Alberta Diary.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.