rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Laurie Hawn explains why Canada is sure to succeed in Afghanistan… we were invited!

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $5 per month!

Edmonton-Centre MP Laurie Hawn

Canada will succeed at whatever it is we are trying to accomplish in Afghanistan. The reason, in case you've been wondering, is this: we were invited.

This pearl of wisdom from Laurie Hawn, Conservative Member of Parliament for Edmonton-Centre, former Air Force lieutenant-colonel (where he survived taking off and landing in the infamous CF-104 "Widowmaker") and founding member of the Investment Advisors Association of Canada.

Hitherto, Hawn was best known for his sponsorship in 2009 of a federal "economic stimulus package" worth a million free-floating Canadian Credonias to the hoity-toity Glenora Club in his riding. At the time, as blogger Dave Cournoyer pointed out on Daveberta.ca, an annual family membership cost $4,065.

But never mind that! If you've ever wondered what makes our few Canadian soldiers more likely to succeed in Afghanistan than those of Alexander the Great, Genghis Khan, Tamerlane, the Russian Tsar, the British Empire and the Soviet Union, well, thanks to Hawn's explanation there's no need to wonder any more…

Hawn, with his military man's understanding of things (gained, granted, soaring airily somewhere high among the clouds above) has explained it all at a recent forum that was unfortunately covered only by the community press.

At least he didn't say it was because the Taliban don't have American help, like they did back in the 1980s after the Red Army invaded the place in 1979, keeping 100,000 troops in the country at any given time over the nine years it took for the Afghans to drive them out.

However, all those suggestions by people who keep quoting history books to reach the conclusion the decade-long meat-grinder the Canadian Forces have been struggling through in Afghanistan is certain to end badly just don't get it, Hawn told a forum attended by 30 hardy citizens in north Edmonton on the freezing night of Feb. 22.

The invitation makes all the difference, he explained. "We were there at the request of the most legitimate Afghan authority we could find." (Emphasis added.)

That's probably subject to contention in certain circles, since the previous government of Afghanistan had just been toppled by our American allies in the fall of 2001, but in fairness it probably was the most legitimate government around by the time we got there.

Regardless, though, I am sorry to report that Hawn is wrong, that having an invite is no guarantee of success in the Hindu Kush.  Indeed, the Red Army had not only one invitation, but was repeatedly requested by the Afghan government of the day to intervene in the troubled country in 1978.

Alas for the Soviets, when they RSVP'd the Afghan government, presumably the most legitimate authority they could find at the time, and then took it up on its frequent invitations, things nevertheless turned out badly: 14,453 soldiers killed, 53,753 wounded and 311 missing.

Thankfully, Hawn got one thing right. The Afghan government led by President Hamid Karzai that we're propping up at a huge expenditure of blood and treasure is utterly corrupt, and thickly populated by successful drug pushers to boot. "There's no question about it. Karzai is not the cleanest guy on the block," Hawn observed acutely. Oh well, at least he's our dirty guy!

All this leads inevitably to the question of why our federal Conservative politicians say stuff like this, which an alert reader can prove is wrong within a portion of a second merely by using Google.

Personally, I suspect it's because they think we're dopes and they can tell us whatever pops into their heads and we'll believe them. And, you know, given the voting records of citizens in this some parts of this country, there just might be some evidence for just this proposition.

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, Alberta Diary.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.