rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Great newspapers support great causes, and the Toronto Star supports the NDP

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Joseph E. Atkinson in 1899

Great newspapers support great causes and Canada is a great cause.

I'm not sure if it was Joseph Atkinson or Beland Honderich, both great leaders of the Toronto Star in their day, who said this, or something like it. For once, Google seems to have failed me. So perhaps it was just an urban myth, or the effects upon my mind of "an undigested bit of beef, a blot of mustard, a crumb of cheese, a fragment of an underdone potato."

Doesn't matter. The statement is profoundly true on all counts, whoever said it, and the Star proved Saturday with its editorial calling on Canadians to elect an NDP government in Ottawa that it is a great newspaper.

Indeed, as we await the results of today's historic federal election, it is worth pondering the thought that the Star is Canada's only remaining daily newspaper still worth being described as great.

There's more to that than just a single election editorial, of course, but the Star's editorial Saturday is another piece of evidence for that assertion. All the more so, as the Star is known traditionally as a Big-L Liberal newspaper.

"Fortunately, this time there is a real choice," the Star editorial concluded. "Voters who believe Canada should aspire to something greater than the crabbed, narrow vision offered by the Harper Conservatives should look to Jack Layton and the New Democrats on Monday." The entire editorial is worth reading, and you can read it yourself by clicking here.

The Star cautioned elsewhere that voters in some ridings will still need to vote strategically by voting for "the progressive candidate best placed to win." To fail to do this, the paper cautioned, could tip the election to the Conservatives, and "that would be the worst outcome for the province -- and the country."

Meanwhile, the rest of Canada's chain-owned print media firmament, every one in decaying low orbits, churned out dreary lists of Conservative talking points for their election editorials, leading to unsurprising endorsations of the party most likely to serve their owners' interests, the aforementioned Harper Conservatives.

Many of them -- including the appalling Sun Media chain -- campaigned openly and dishonestly for the government right in their news columns. Writers for the Southam/Canwest/Postmedia chain, including a few winners of the Atkinson Fellowship sad to say, in effect did the same thing, but at least with less obvious enthusiasm than their swift-boating compadres at the various yellow dwarf Suns.

It is ironic that media limited to four questions a day by this vindictive and anti-democratic prime minister endorsed his re-election without a whimper of protest, all but the Star.

Well, the Globe and Mail always was the fearless champion of the overdog, and the rest of them aspired to the same thing with varying degrees of skill. Only the Star -- for all its many sins of omission and commission over generations -- has pretty consistently advocated progressive causes that would benefit Canadians since Atkinson became editor in 1899.

As Honderich wrote in 1999, before following his predecessor into history, "Mr. Atkinson, by his own admission, was a 'tireless, unremitting propagandist' for social and economic justice. He was a leader in the struggle for sickness and unemployment insurance, old age pensions, mother’s allowance and much more.

"His vision of a Canada in 1899 as a strong independent nation capable of governing itself helped to shape the country's future. So did his strong support, often in the face of angry criticism, of workers' right to organize, bargain collectively, and strike if necessary to improve their wages."

I'm not persuaded that many Canadian readers pay much attention to newspaper editorials any more, rightly concluding they are mere exercises in corporate group think, and boring ones at that.

The Star's courageous election editorial, like the paper that published it, is a worthy exception.

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, Alberta Diary.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.