rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Evil twins: Alberta Tories assail Wildrosers, and vice versa

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

I'll admit I laughed out loud when I read in the Calgary Herald that Alberta Premier Alison Redford had accused her far-right opposition, the Wildrose Party, of being an organization ready to break any rule to win.

Not that I doubt Redford for a moment on this one, which she delivered in a speech Friday night at the start of her Progressive Conservative Party's policy conference in Edmonton. Indeed, I reckon she pretty much nailed it as far as the Wildrose Party and Opposition Leader Danielle Smith are concerned.

The Wildrosers are, after all, the Alberta home office of the yin', chitin', vote-suppressin', Senate packing' federal Wildrose Party down in Ottawa that's headed by Prime Minister Stephen "Calgary Steve" Harper. And the ties between the Calgary Gang in the national capital and Wildrosers back here on the western edge of the Great Plains are well understood by all and Sundre (Alberta joke, that) to be extremely cozy.

So it was pretty hard to argue with Redford when she took note of the $90,000 fine levied by the Canadian Radio-television and Telecommunications Commission against the Wildrose Party for an improperly identified robo-call just before the 2012 provincial election and suggested between the lines Smith's party must have known they were breaking the rules when they broke them.

The company that made the robo-calls for the Wildrose Party, evocatively, was the same Edmonton firm used by the mysterious Pierre Poutine to direct voters identified by Conservative campaign callers as supporters of other parties in numerous ridings to the wrong polling stations or polling stations that didn't exist.

It's just that the party Redford leads is one that, you know, is also ready to break pretty well any old rule to win pretty well any old fight!

Redford's PCs were, after all, the conservative party that saw nothing wrong with drug store bazillionaire Daryl Katz's $430,000 donation, which magically turned out to comply with the province's maximum $30,000 donation law after an investigation by Elections Alberta. (See, it was actually several donations, just rolled into a single cheque for convenience sake.)

Nor were the PCs concerned about generous insider shares once sold to another PC premier's wife, or the high cost back in the day of undocumented verbal advice to a minister's political aide who was nevertheless later rewarded by being made the party's executive director under Premier Redford.

Nor, for that matter, were they seemingly troubled by the possibly illegal use in 2011 of the PC Party's own membership list to help a polling firm conduct a survey that just happened to vault a certain leadership candidate into the premier's job. You know, the leak that prompted the stinging rebuke by the party president, who vowed to launch an investigation to get to the bottom of whom the leaker was, a promise that was forgotten as soon as Redford emerged victorious.

And all that's without even raising the topic of public service labour relations!

Anyway, you get the picture.

Meanwhile, one has to give Redford credit for keeping the $90,000 CRTC fine on the agenda longer than it was thought here that she could, and indeed for managing to up the ante a little.

The premier challenged the Wildrose to release the details of the CRTC’s ruling -- which was communicated to the party by the national broadcast regulator but not published, and only revealed by Edmonton Global TV News -- instead of trying to pass it off as a mere administrative penalty.

This, the Wildrose Party refused to do, at least over the weekend, giving the Tories a credible reason to keep the issue on the front burner for a little longer.

The tone of the weekend policy conference -- notwithstanding a few hundred protesters in the rain outside on Saturday -- suggests any actual internal party opposition to the premier in advance of next fall's leadership review is subsiding.

So instead of trying to appear as hard-edged as the Wildrosers to woo back Tory turncoats, Redford seemed to be returning to last year's efforts to paint her party as less extreme on economic and social issues than Smith's version of Alberta conservatism.

"We know that the Opposition will redouble their efforts to deny who they really are in the months ahead," Redford told the Tory policy conference. "And I fully expect them once again to sweep some of their extreme policies under the rug, and to pretend to be something that they're not. But they'll only succeed in exposing their own hypocrisy."

And who can doubt Redford's parallel assertion that "we see every day, and we certainly saw today in the news, political parties that are prepared to get involved in tactics that undermine the political process."

Count on it that everyone at her party's policy conference understood that through this none-too-subtle reference to the federal vote-suppression court judgment last week she was connecting the dots from the vote suppression tactics used by Harper's federal party, to the prime minister himself, to his close friends in the Wildrose Party back here in Alberta, to that party's own robo-call woes.

What she didn't say, of course, is that while most Wildrose members are also federal Conservatives, so are a similar percentage of her own party's members.

In other words, if you want to put an end to these kinds of shenanigans, you're probably not going to achieve that goal by voting for either of these two conservative parties. Just saying.

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, Alberta Diary.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.