rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Alberta Tories respond to protests by disabled citizens with instinctive diversionary attack

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

The optics of a government like Alberta's Progressive Conservatives cutting $42 million from programs designed to help the province's most vulnerable citizens become more employable are pretty horrible.

What's astonishing, though, is that it seems to have come to a huge surprise to the government of Premier Alison Redford that large numbers of the province's "persons with developmental disabilities" would vigourously protest the cuts -- and that such heart-rending demonstrations by vulnerable people would attract both media attention and public sympathy.

Less astonishing was the government's swift reaction -- somewhere in the Tory political lizard brain is an instinct to mount a diversionary attack when something goes awry. After all, a good noisy scrap with a third party means voters are less likely to concentrate too much on a government’s obvious deficiencies.

This government was faced with the spectacle of increasingly anguished protests by obviously disabled and vulnerable people, at one of which last Wednesday the police tactical squad was called to a packed town hall meeting in Edmonton to take down a distraught disabled man. Someone said the man had threatened Frank Oberle, the associate minister of services for persons with disabilities, who was trying make the government's case at the meeting.

Perhaps sensing that men in black armed with automatic rifles in the lobby was not the best way to project the image of a government anxious to have "a conversation" with voters, as the PCs like to put it nowadays, the government quickly tried to turn embarrassment into a brawl with the non-profits that currently provide many of the services.

So the Natural Governing Party is now busy pushing the idea it’s not cutting anything, just reorganizing the way services to the disabled are delivered, and spinning the notion the protests are all about greedy businesses upset that bigger and more efficient companies will get the work after the cuts go into effect on July 1.

Last Friday in Calgary, for example, Redford suggested the fight was really about whether the money would go to businesses or the individuals who need it. "It is not our commitment to ensure that we keep funding service providers, which are essentially, even as not-for-profits, businesses," said the premier.

As an addendum, she rather glibly observed that "people are nervous because change is always difficult."

In a backhanded way, the government has a point, if only because the shell game it's been playing with support for the disabled in the March 2013 provincial budget.

It's been moving supports for people with other disabilities into the so-called PDD budget envelope, changing funds available for contracts with service providers, not communicating what it's doing with anyone, bragging it's cutting the budget to fight the deficit, insisting the changes have nothing to do with cutting the budget and generally making it extremely hard for anyone to have a clear picture of what's really going on.

It's difficult to believe this level of confusion isn't intentional, although we should never rule out the possibility that what we suspect is malice is really merely incompetence.

It's hard to forget that in 2011 when Redford was running from behind for the leadership of the Alberta Progressive Conservative Party, she successfully and popularly positioned herself as the candidate who believed "a healthy society looks after its most vulnerable."

She vowed to increase Assured Income for the Severely Handicapped, the monthly payments made to people with permanent disabilities who are unable to work, and she delivered on that promise.

In the government's pre-Bitumen-Bubble 2012 budget, AISH payments grew by $400 a month to $1,588. The monthly employment exemption threshold for AISH recipients also doubled to $800 for single clients and to $1,950 for families. News reports at the time suggested this change cost the government an additional $271 million.

Now, in its post-Bitumen-Bubble 2013 budget, the same government is hacking $42 million from services that help people with disabilities learn work skills.

According to various news reports, about 40,000 Albertans receive AISH, while about 10,000 benefit from the services that are being cut.

Surely in many cases they're the same people. So while one hates to use this phrase, it sure sounds as if despite its leadership change in 2011 this is still a government with no plan -- other than, maybe, building a pipeline to somewhere.

The government's shock at last week's protests and its diversionary attack on the service providers who will soon be replaced by bigger and better-connected contractors both suggest just how arrogant and disconnected this nearly 42-year-old conservative dynasty has become.

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, Alberta Diary.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.

Comments

We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:

Do

  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.

Don't

  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.