rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

'Kevinismus' in Canada: Should Kevin O'Leary run to lead the sad-sack federal Conservatives?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Kevin O'Leary

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Give Kevin O'Leary his due. At least the guy is faintly entertaining.

Perhaps O'Leary should run for public office himself, or at least the leadership of the sad-sack federal Conservatives.

Being a loud-mouthed, deep pocketed, obnoxious former entertainer whose mind is not exactly in the first rank, but whose devoted fans could care less, is obviously no barrier to political success in North America nowadays.

This may be true even if, unlike loud-mouthed would-be American Republican president Donald Trump or loud-mouthed would-be Alberta conservative premier Thomas Lukaszuk, you don't exactly excel in the tonsorial department.

Just knowing how to get noticed gives the slaphead neocon meat puppet -- I've been waiting for a legitimate chance to say that about someone for years -- a significant edge over the sorry field of contenders striving to replace the unlamented Stephen Harper as leader of the foundering Conservatives, the party that only had one big idea and that was pipelines.

At least when O'Leary offers to pony up a million dollars in stock purchases for the Alberta oil industry (some endorsement of them!) if Alberta Premier Rachel Notley will only step aside, or when he claims Notley is not qualified for her job (not having a suggestively named TV show of her own, I guess) folks actually notice and journalists write everything down.

This annoys plenty of people -- when O'Leary first flapped his gums at Notley, it seemed as if half the registered Twitter users in Alberta had the identical visceral reaction: 'What an asshat!" Only, of course, they didn't say … "hat." But at least they noticed, and they mostly they didn't also laugh out loud.

In that regard, compare O'Leary's pronouncements to the kind of things real rumoured candidates for the Tory leadership are saying. I could have sworn I heard Lisa Raitt, the Tory finance critic (or as we say here in Alberta, where pretentiousness may be all we have left, the Shadow Minister of Finance), on the CBC today complaining that Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shouldn't be spending money on economic stimulus when he could be doing like his predecessor and trying to build pipelines!

No sign of the story on the CBC's website tonight, but maybe they were embarrassed, or inundated with queries from listeners wondering what those pipelines were supposed to carry now that oil prices are scraping the bottom of the bbl -- French perfume? Cod liver oil?

Like Trump and Lukasazuk, O'Leary strikes me as the kind of fellow who thinks he's won every argument he’s been in -- even if he, ummmm, hasn't exactly.

I think both he and Notley came out of their recent sound bite battle confident they'd won. "The last time a group of wealthy businessmen tried to tell Alberta voters how to vote, I ended up becoming premier,” Notley observed, accurately enough.

Call me partisan, but I give the contest to Notley on points -- even if I would have preferred if she hadn’t used the phrase "bring it on," which, if anyone had asked me, always carries a whiff of hubris.

Alert readers will recall President George W. Bush saying something similar back in 2003, in response to a reporter's question about Iraqi insurgents shooting at American troops in their country. "My answer is bring 'em on! We got the force necessary to deal with the security situation," President Bush famously said, after which they did. Even Bush now admits that was probably a mistake, which is a big step for a conservative.

If I wrote Notley's one liners, I would have recommended something that conveyed the same message, but without tempting fate. You know, like: "Go ahead … make my day."

I suppose we should be careful what we wish for, but it does seem to me O'Leary would not only a better choice for the federal Tories than anything they've got on offer at the moment, but be someone who has the potential to make Kevinism respectable again.

For those of you who live a protected North American lifestyle, the idea of Kevinism is a genuine meme in Germany right now -- or, as the Germans would put it, Kevinismus.

Discover magazine explains: "Another day, another crazy German noun: Kevinismus, which basically means, 'You're named Kevin? Sucks to be you.' According to a study of interactions on the German dating site eDarling, online daters don't even bother to click on the profiles of users with names … like Kevin. The authors suggest that this online neglect due to their unpopular names mirrors lifelong social neglect, which is also responsible for making Kevins smoke more, get less education, and have lower self-esteem."

Or, as an actual German site explained: "Kevinismus leads sufferers, and especially their offspring, to social isolation."

That would explain a lot, don't you think? That's all I'm going to have to say on the topic of Kevin O'Leary.

NOTE: A few hours after this post was published, media began to report that Mr. O'Leary is in fact considering a run for the leadership of the federal Conservative Party. Life imitates art. This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.