rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Deplorable Wildrose attack on new government negotiator offers glimpse of what party leaders really think

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

The Wildrose Party's troublingly vicious personal attack on Kevin Davediuk earlier this month illustrates the degree to which rigid anti-union ideology now dominates Alberta's largest Opposition party.

Davediuk is the former corporate and union negotiator appointed as the Alberta government's senior public sector labour-contract bargainer on March 9. His most recent position was as a senior negotiator employed by the Alberta Union of Provincial Employees, which represents unionized Alberta civil servants in addition to large numbers of public-sector health care workers.

The Wildrose attack on Davediuk's appointment most likely began principally as cynical mischief designed to undermine anything done by the New Democratic Party Government of Premier Rachel Notley.

But the highly personal attack on Davediuk's character by Wildrose Finance Critic Derek Fildebrandt in particular tells a compelling story about the current Wildrose leadership's McCarthyist attitudes toward unions and people who work for them, either as volunteers or staff members.

In this, it would seem, the Wildrose Party not only reflects, but now significantly surpasses, the hostility toward unions of the former Conservative federal government of prime minister Stephen Harper.

In a Postmedia news report that appeared in the tabloid and broadsheet versions of that Toronto-based publishing company's Edmonton edition, Fildebrandt all but accused Davediuk of being prepared to intentionally throw the game in negotiations to benefit his former employer.

"AUPE will be negotiating from both sides of the table with no representation for taxpayers," Fildebrandt told the Edmonton Journal-Edmonton Sun reporter. "This is little better than hiring the fox to guard the henhouse."

If this does not meet the legal definition of a defamatory statement, it sails very close to the wind.

This union-baiting was soon repeated along the Postmedia barking chain as Calgary Sun columnist Rick Bell quoted Fildebrandt doubling down on his assessment of Davediuk's character with the claim the result would be "sham bargaining."

"The NDP is flipping the coin here and both sides are tails for the taxpayers," Bell quoted the Wildrose finance critic as saying. "This is the AUPE sitting across the table from the AUPE with the poor taxpayer not even represented in the room."

Whatever you may think about unions in general or AUPE in particular, there is not a shred of evidence to indicate Davediuk would conduct himself in the way Fildebrandt suggests, and a considerable amount to the contrary.

Now, in the interests of full disclosure, I am obligated to say that I too am a former employee of AUPE and, in that capacity, I worked with Davediuk and hold his abilities and his character in high regard.

I also know of his reputation from the many years he spent as an extremely effective employer representative at the bargaining table. So if you ask me, the parties that ought to be most concerned by his appointment are those on the union side of the table.

In my experience, union contract negotiators (and their employer counterparts) are in this regard like professional hockey players and litigation lawyers: they play to win for whomever they represent.

Some of the best ones (and in my estimation Davediuk is one of the best ones) from time to time move from one side of the table to the other.

I suppose that's why Harper, back when he was Conservative prime minister of Canada, hired a former union negotiator (and NDP politician) to represent Canada as ambassador in Washington, D.C.

Before serving ably as the New Democrat premier of Manitoba, Gary Doer, appointed ambassador to the United States by Harper in the fall of 2009, was for seven years the president of the Manitoba Government Employees Association, that province's equivalent of AUPE, and also played an important role in the Manitoba Federation of Labour.

Who knows, perhaps Harper, no fan of unions generally, was impressed by the fact that back in 1984 Doer attacked the leadership of Canadian Labour Congress president Dennis McDermott -- who, by the way, was made Canadian ambassador to Ireland by another Conservative prime minister, Brian Mulroney.

Regardless of the former PM's reasoning, Doer effectively represented Canadians in Washington until his retirement 18 days ago.

The Wildrose leadership, however, now far surpasses Mulroney and even Harper in the purity of its harsh ideology. As far as the Wildrosers are concerned, apparently, employment by a union and perhaps membership in one amounts to ideological contamination and prima facie evidence of bad character.

As for the Wildrose Party's cheerleaders at Postmedia, I doubt it would occur even to them to draw similar conclusions about a businessperson hired by a government to negotiate with corporations. And yet the same faulty logic would obviously be quite consistent.

The Wildrose Party's conduct in this case should be seen as a warning sign of its attitudes about the rights of working people to bargain collectively. Fildebrandt's unjustified character assassination of Davediuk is simply deplorable.

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.