rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Cue the crickets: Where are the media warnings Canada Post bosses are 'holding the country to ransom'?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Locked out CUPW members, 2011 (David Ball Photo)

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

It's funny, you know, but there doesn't seem to have been a single mainstream media news story accusing Canada Post management of "holding the country to ransom" with the 72-hour lockout notice they filed Monday that could bring Canada's postal system to its knees by the end of the week.

Isn't that the accusation reflexively aimed at the Canadian Union of Postal Workers any time the labour relations S-word is mentioned in negotiations with the Crown corporation that delivers our mail?

Yet news coverage of this important labour dispute -- and it's important in more ways than simply from a labour relations perspective -- barely makes the effort to distinguish between a strike (a work stoppage by working people) and a lockout (the same thing put into effect by an employer), let alone report the union's issues in these negotiations.

The Canadian Press story on Canada Post's lockout notice that was used by most media outfits doesn't even bother to mention the union's position on the key issue of pensions, merely parroting management's talking points with few details.

But apparently Canada Post, packed with managers put in place by the previous Conservative government who are committed to privatization of postal services and the anti-social policies of degrading workers' pensions and blocking pay equity, feel getting their way is important enough to hold the country to ransom.

From a labour relations perspective, this hardly seems like an issue worthy of shutting down the national postal system to bring negotiations that are ongoing to an immediate national crisis.

So this kind of behaviour by Canada Post's senior management lends credence to the suspicion among postal workers that these Tory-appointed executives are trying to derail the review of postal services announced by the Liberal government of Prime Minister Justin Trudeau back in May.

Since the Liberals promised during the election campaign to restore home delivery for many Canadians -- as in every other advanced industrialized country -- this presents a real threat to the apparent agenda of the would-be privatizers at the Crown corporation, which has posted a profit in every year in its modern history except 2011, when there was a labour dispute.

"Management will point to this lockout and say the Crown corporation is unsustainable, unprofitable and the dramatic changes it was trying to bring in were the correct ones," writes David Bush in an analysis published by RankAndFile.ca, a pro-union website. "This will be the drum they beat in the media and dutiful columnists and journalists will run with it."

In a news release yesterday, CUPW made much the same point: "They are sabotaging the public review of the post office," said CUPW President Mike Palecek in the release. "They refused to negotiate fairly with us and now they're locking the doors and will try to starve us into submission."

"This is brought to you by the men who wanted to take away home delivery," Palecek said. "They wanted us to sell out the next generation of Canadian postal workers for a quick deal, but we stood firm. Now they're going to hold the public hostage until they get what they want." (Emphasis added. Don't look for this to be repeated very often by the mainstream media, though.)

Canada Post is led by President Deepak Chopra, appointed by the Harper government for a five-year term in January in 2011. Whether or not he is a Conservative partisan, as has been argued by many supporters of improved postal services, the former CEO of Pitney Bowes Inc.'s Canadian operations certainly seems to see eye to eye on employment issues with the former Harper government.

In early 2015, when the Harper government was clearly sensing harbingers of the change that brought Trudeau to power, Chopra, by now unpopular with the public because of Canada Post's plan to completely eliminate door-to-door mail delivery, was reappointed to another five-year term notwithstanding the looming election.

After the election, the Liberals asked Chopra to resign and reapply for the job. He refused. Which brings us up to the present state of affairs.

However, the Canada Post position on pensions is part of a bigger trend in our society to transfer the costs of caring for citizens of ordinary means in their final years to taxpayers while allowing the corporate sector and especially the so-called "wealth management” industry to pocket a nice share of the benefits.

Those chambers of commerce and federations of businesses that scream about the insignificant costs to their members of necessary improvements to the Canada Pension Plan are in a sense are being asked to pay a small part of the price of the trend toward the elimination of fair pensions in society, which they also advocate.

It's truly appalling if hardly surprising that a publicly owned institution is leading the way with this pernicious and anti-social trend, as Canada Post is doing.

Which makes this an opportune moment for our Liberal federal government -- in which a great many progressive Canadians have placed their hopes, faith and votes -- to remove Canada Post's management, which appears to be both driven by the same ideology as the Harper government and wildly out of sync with the wishes of most Canadians.

When the review of postal services has been completed, one would hope our country will again have the postal services it needs, including door-to-door delivery, and postal service managers committed to essential public services for all, as befits a modern democracy.

The Tory appointees in senior management should be sent packing. No need to feel sorry for them -- one senses they will have no trouble landing on their feet in the private sector.

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Like this article? rabble is reader-supported journalism. Chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.