rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

The question must be asked: Was Brad Wall's party being paid to undermine Alberta's NDP?

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Canadian Premiers

The question must now be asked: Were the attacks by Saskatchewan's premier over the past year and a half on the policies of Alberta’s NDP government just an interprovincial rivalry with an ideological tilt, or were they made in return for more than $2-million in donations from Alberta corporations reported Tuesday by an Edmonton-based progressive advocacy group?

Likewise, were the many Alberta companies that gave all this money to Brad Wall's Saskatchewan Party merely supporting a politician they liked in a province where they might someday do business, or were they intentionally circumventing Alberta's tough election financing laws, which ban donations from corporations and unions, confident in the knowledge Wall's comments would be extensively covered by media in Alberta?

Back in July 2015, when the now famous spat between Wall and his Alberta counterpart Rachel Notley made headlines during the meeting of Canadian premiers in St. John’s, N.L., Notley gently dismissed Wall's outburst as "ridiculous."

The Saskatchewan premier had blown a gasket in St. John's, accusing Notley of offering a "veto" to Ontario and Quebec on bitumen pipelines from the west because he disapproved of her social license approach to winning approval for such projects. Wall seems to favour dictating his plans to other provinces, and casting aspersions on those who disagreed with him when that doesn't work out.

That very day, Wall's cheering section in mainstream media picked up his bleating and broadcasted it throughout Alberta. Since then, it’s rarely stopped.

For her part, Notley shrugged off Wall's tantrum at the time as "a little bit of showboating" and expressed the view "you don't get things done by picking fights with people gratuitously.”

That's true enough, of course, if the fight you're picking has the goal -- common to both Wall and Notley -- of getting a pipeline built from the Prairies to what we Canadians quaintly call tidewater. But in light of Progress Alberta's revelations this week, I think we need to look at this in a different light. We should at least consider the possibility that Wall was rendering a service in Alberta for the people who were investing generously in his political party back in Saskatchewan.

Since July 2015 there has been a series of similar events -- each one rebroadcast enthusiastically by the Alberta right's mainstream and social media auxiliaries. Wall has attacked the Alberta government over carbon taxes, pipeline policies and even beer sales. The latter prompted the usually upbeat Notley to accuse Wall of executing a "political drive-by" with his vocal complaints.

For a guy who's supposed to be the Mr. Congeniality of Canadian politics, Wall sure seems to spend his days in a state of suppressed fury at the Alberta government.

This led recently to Jason Kenney -- the would be uniter of the Progressive Conservative and Wildrose Parties in one super-right, social-conservative political entity -- declaring Wall to be "the real leader of Western Canada."

Well, as blogger Dave Cournoyer pointed out in a highly entertaining post on this topic yesterday, while it's unusual nowadays, there's nothing unique about Western Canadian premiers interfering in the politics of other provinces -- as Bible Bill Aberhart's Social Credit majority government did without much success in the 1938 Saskatchewan provincial election.

Much the same thing is happening right now on the other side of the Canada-U.S. border, with the governor of Wyoming travelling to Washington State to press locals into allowing a terminal to be built to ship Wyoming coal to Asia.

"The decisions those folks on the coast are making affect more than just the future of their state,” Gov. Matt Mead told the New York Times in a lament that will surely sound eerily familiar to many Western Canadians. "It is deciding the future of citizens of Wyoming and Montana and other major coal states."

Gov. Mead's pleas on behalf of the largest state exporter of coal sound a lot like what Wall would dismiss as a lily-livered attempt at gaining social license -- but then they have a different constitution in the United States, a place where the phrase "states' rights" resonates.

Meanwhile yesterday, Wall's government was running advertisements designed to look like news stories in Calgary’s and Edmonton's Postmedia newspapers that sounded very much as if they were once again trying to woo businesses away from Alberta.

Well, that may annoy the Alberta government, but it's not quite the same as Wall putting his oar directly into Alberta politics with a little bit of help from his deep-pocketed pals in Calgary and their buddies in the media.

I wonder what Wall's allies in Alberta would say if the NDP government started doing the same thing in Saskatchewan?

This post also appears on David Climenhaga's blog, AlbertaPolitics.ca.

Please chip in to keep stories like these coming.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.