rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

NDP, Liberals and Greens agree on an approach to assess carbon pollution reduction

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Though there was virtually no media attention paid to it, the House of Commons recently featured an interesting debate on climate change. NDP, Liberal, and Conservative MPs weighed in on the NDP’s private members bill, the Climate Change Accountability Act.

 The proposed Act sets Canadian targets for carbon emission reductions for 2025 and 2050 that are in line with what the science says is necessary to avoid the worst climate change impacts. In the short-term, Canada must reduce emissions by one-third (34 per cent to be exact) over the next 10 years.

 Just as importantly, the Act would mandate accountability measures: Cabinet must develop a plan to meet those targets (and others set in five-year periods). Every year the environment minister must report to Parliament on the government’s activities to address carbon pollution. And every two years the environment commissioner must assess the government’s progress and provide recommendations. These measures are crucial given that Canadian governments have always been much better at setting carbon pollution targets than actually meeting them. In just the most recent example, the current federal government is on track to miss its 2020 carbon reduction target by a mile.

This version of the Act is modeled on one by the same name that was passed by the House of Commons in 2010 and killed in the Senate. (It may have been the first time in Canadian history that the unelected senate voted down a bill passed by the House before it was even debated.)

 What the recent House debate revealed is that, like the 2010 bill, the new Climate Change Accountability Act was supported by all opposition parties. Matthew Kellway, the NDP MP who sponsored the bill, has been calling it Jack Layton’s bill, likely because of Layton’s popularity and how much political capital he invested in the 2010 version. Liberal environment critic John McKay supported the bill on behalf of his party, saying the bill showed “a seriousness on the part of some parliamentarians to actually deal with what many say is the existential threat of our time.” The Green Party has also expressed its support.

The government, meanwhile, made the same nonsensical argument it has been making for years. Colin Carrie, the parliamentary secretary to Canada’s environment minister, implied that the only way to significantly reduce emissions is to shut down major parts of the economy. It’s like members of the federal government have never seen a windmill, heard of electric cars, or understood the incredible energy and money that can be saved by investments in energy efficiency.

Nonetheless, the fact that opposition parties are not only agreeing on action on climate change, but the short-term targets and measures that are needed, is a big step in the right direction. Given that there will be a federal election this fall and the United Nations climate change summit in Paris in December looms immediately afterward, this is not the last time we will hear a debate about what federal politicians will do to tackle climate change and the carbon pollution that causes it.

We just hope that debate turns into action. 


Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.