The Guardian and Jezebel both published stories within the past 24 hours about how the French minister for women supposedly 'let down Muslim voters' by focusing on ending prostitution. Because, you know, violence against women is such a marginal issue.
Both sites use this quote: “Criminalised clients means murdered prostitutes” as a way to manipulate readers into believing that criminalizing exploitative men is somehow detrimental to women. A more accurate way to represent the fact that prostituted women are subjected to violence on a daily basis would be to say that, in fact, it is pimps and johns (oh but ‘clients’ just sounds so much tidier, doesn’t it?) that murder (and abuse and beat and rape and exploit prostitutes). BUT WHY BOTHER WITH ALL THAT.
France has taken an abolitionist perspective with regard to prostitution and is therefore looking at adopting legislation similar to other progressive countries such as Sweden, Norway and Iceland wherein johns are criminalized and prostituted women are decriminalized (sometimes referred to as the Nordic or Swedish model). And horror of horrors! The minister for women, Najat Vallaud-Belkacem, is actually following through on that. What's that? A minister for women who cares about women's rights? I know, so crazy, right?
The Guardian calls her ‘naive’ and Jezebel frames the whole thing as a silly waste of time, writing that Vallaud-Belkacem should be focusing on more ‘meaningful reforms’. I don’t know what they think a minister for women should be focusing on instead of equality and women’s rights or why it’s necessary to pit the work to end prostitution and violence against women against lifting the burqa ban – it seems unnecessary, but anything to pit women and women’s issues against one another, I suppose. That’s the best way to keep women down and prevent us from moving forward. That and telling us that prostitution empowers women…
Framing the minister’s goal to end prostitution as being marginal, and as a goal that exists, somehow, in competition with lifting the burqa ban, and as something no one really cares about anyway is extremely irresponsible and inaccurate.
If you care about women, you care about ending violence against women. Period. If you care about equality and about women’s human rights, then you care about creating a world where women are not exploited on a a daily basis.
I’d like to be able to expect more than this kind of anti-feminist, anti-woman coverage from The Guardian and from Jezebel.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.