rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Cabinet to proceed with legislation criminalizing johns in Republic of Ireland

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

The Irish Times reports that Cabinet has decided to proceed with legislation that will criminalize johns in the Republic of Ireland. Members of the Stormont assembly voted in favour of a bill that would outlaw the purchase of sex last month in Northern Ireland. The decision to adopt this legislation in the Republic of Ireland is part of a growing trend, in terms of prostitution law.

The Nordic model, also sometimes referred to as the Swedish model or the "women’s liberation approach" is being adopted and considered by more and more countries. Witnessing the failures of legalization and full decriminalizaton -- which merely resulted in an increase in prostitution and sex trafficking and failed to reduce violence against women -- and the successes of the Nordic model since it was adopted in Sweden in 1999, makes the choice to criminalize johns a natural one if we do, indeed, care about gender equality and the rights and humanity of women.

As noted by author and activist, Rachel Moran,

It is not strange or surprising that prostitution rates in Denmark are many times higher than in Sweden. The figures tell an irrefutable story: the population of Sweden is 9.4 million and prostituted persons there are estimated to number 650. At 5.6 million, Denmark’s population is close to half that, but the estimated figure for Denmark is 5,567; almost nine times that of neighbouring Sweden.

She also points out that legislation that legalizes buying sex from women is deeply misogynist and upholds a vision of women as second-class citizens.

Like many campaigners who have personal experience of prostitution, I support the "Nordic model", which criminalizes the demand for paid sexual access to people, decriminalizes those who are so exploited, and offers exit routes including education and training. It can only be objected to from a standpoint that refuses to view women as fully viable humans on a par with men. The reason for this is simple: the overwhelming majority of those exploited in prostitution are female. Added to that, many are adolescent girls below the age of consent. I know from first-hand experience that very often females are prostituted before they've even reached the age of sexual consent. That was the case for me also; I was 15 years old when I was coerced into prostitution by an adult male.

The Nordic model is unique in that, like recent efforts to shift blame away from sexual assault victims and onto perpetrators, for example, it places onus on those responsible for the violence against and exploitation of women in prostitution: men. Seeing as men are the ones who truly "choose" prostitution in that they are the ones who are responsible for the existence of the industry, whereas the vast majority of women and girls only enter into the industry under duress or because they are forced, this model is the most logical solution.

Moran says the legislation "will make Northern Ireland a hostile environment for pimping and trafficking gangs" and that "organized pimping and trafficking gangs that have plagued us for years will soon be looking for somewhere else to go."

Despite efforts to sanitize and normalize the industry by lobby groups and sex industry advocates, the fact remains that prostitution exists because of -- not as a solution to -- inequality and systemic oppression. If we did not, as a society, view sexual access to women as something men had a right to, we would not view prostitution as acceptable.

Moran writes:

It is high time we women stood up and asked ourselves why we are accepting an enormous global human rights violation whereby almost all of those exploited are female and almost all of those exploiting them are male. Here’s my answer: we are accepting it because females have been so long at the bottom of the gender caste system that we have come to accept the inferior position imposed upon us. We need to get out of that mode of thinking, and fast, because there is a legislative battle raging right now in the world; it is the battle for female sexual liberation and it is opposed tooth and nail by those invested in female sexual subjection.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.