I’ve never actually seen “The Vagina Monologues” and, frankly, it doesn’t strike me as all that interesting or radical (but what do I know — again, haven’t seen or read it) so I feel odd defending something I’ve never much cared about. That said, this is getting ridiculous.
Campus Reform reported that “Mount Holyoke College, an all-women’s college in Massachusetts, is retiring its annual production of the Vagina Monologues this year because the play is not inclusive of transgender students.”
Since when are vaginas supposed to be “inclusive?” These are our bodies. Vaginas are something females have. There isn’t anything we can do about that. Our bodies do not have to be the same as all other bodies, nor should we stop talking about the realities of our bodies because it leaves out people who don’t have vaginas.
Campus Reform reports:
In a school-wide email from the Theatre Board, a representative from the group, Erin Murphy, explained the problems with the play and the reasoning behind its discontinuation.
“At its core, the show offers an extremely narrow perspective on what it means to be a woman…Gender is a wide and varied experience, one that cannot simply be reduced to biological or anatomical distinctions, and many of us who have participated in the show have grown increasingly uncomfortable presenting material that is inherently reductionist and exclusive.”
Part of the reason that plays like The Vagina Monologues exist is so that women can stop feeling shame about their bodies — so that there is a space for women to talk about their experiences of trauma and abuse at the hands of men, to talk about their sexualities, and yes, to talk about their vaginas.
But the political climate we are currently living in (henceforth known as the Reign of Stupid) has deemed women talking about being women “exclusionary.”
There are a number of critiques I’ve encountered of the play that read as reasonable to me. “Vaginas exclude people without vaginas” is not one of them. Can there not be, say, more than one play? A vagina one and a not-vagina one? What’s next? Ban the word “vagina?” “Woman?” What is so offensive about us? OH right. That Being-A-Woman thing (also known as that Not-A-Real-Human thing).
Silencing women is super progressive, Mount Holyoke.
This just reeks of the backlash.
Thank you for reading this story…
More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.
rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.
So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.
And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.