rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Choice Feminism on The Talk

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

I don't watch The Talk but someone on Twitter sent me a link to this segment, which aired earlier today, in which the hosts discuss a Las Vegas strip club that is actively recruiting "recent high school graduates" (i.e. 18 year old women).

The strip club, called "Little Darlings" (uh, gross?), created ads with slogans like, “Now auditioning the class of 2015″ and “Pay your way through college.”

KVVU-TV reports that Little Darlings manager Rick Marzullo says he is "offering a way for young women 18 and older to make good money in a struggling economy" and "helping" young women who are struggling to pay rising tuition fees. (What a guy!)

The signs are quite obviously playing on the "barely legal"/"college co-eds gone wild" themes that are so popular in pornography and with older men who buy sex and frequent strip clubs. It's common knowledge that johns and porn-consumers alike often seek out the youngest women possible.

During the segment, Darlene (also known as Sara Gilbert) says "This is so sick to me -- preying on young, 18 year old girls... These girls don't know how this is going to impact their life later -- they just know they have to pay for college now."

Another host, Aisha Tyler, responds: "At 18 you can vote, at 18 you can drive, at 18 you can go to war... I would never strip and I would never want my child to strip but, as a feminist, I don't want to take away the agency of a young woman to make whatever choice she thinks is right for her life at that time. Stripping is not prostitution, these women are protected." She adds, "I know a lot of men who have gone to strip clubs and are like, 'Look, I just went in there and a girl danced on the stage and now I don't have $7000 in my pocket, so who really got taken advantage of in this situation.'" (Darlene looks peeved, at this point.)

Now, we've heard these arguments many times before. Men pretend like they are the ones who are "vulnerable" in these exchanges, because they are the ones "losing money." Of course, if paying for sex or lap dances or going to strip clubs removed men's power, you'd think the patriarchy would be a thing of the distant past by now... What isn't discussed by Tyler is that a primary reason these women are taking off their clothes, on stage, for men, is because they are economically disadvantaged, whereas these men are not. Therefore the power imbalance will always remain. When a wealthy CEO pays a factory worker to make his product, that factory worker is not taking advantage of that CEO. Class does not work that way.

Of course, that existing power imbalance serves men, which is why they continue to ensure women don't have access to other options outside the sex industry to pay for college/life. If suddenly these women had access to free post-secondary school, or good jobs, or universal daycare for mothers, or whatever, there would cease to be a need for women to resort to stripping. Men are not the vulnerable ones, simply because they are paying to objectify young women. That's why they have $7000 in their pockets in the first place and aren't up on stage shaking their dicks around.

Tyler goes on: "We victimize and we fetishize women constantly, but I don't want to say that that's not a way to make a living that could be better than sex work."

Darlene responds, clarifying that she isn't interested in making strip clubs illegal, "I'm saying, 'Don't put ads that are targeting people that just turned into adults.'"

So I guess I have a couple of questions -- if you wouldn't want to be a stripper, yourself, and you also wouldn't want your daughter to work in strip club, what makes it so A-Ok for other women?

Of course, the answer to that question is "choice" and "agency." Also known as, "It's the American way!"

America doesn't want to do anything about poverty, porn culture, a sex industry that preys, particularly, on marginalized women, and they continue to privatize the shit out of everything, which further reinforces class and race disparity, but they do want to talk about how much "choice" and "agency" American citizens have.

The argument that says, "These women are 18 years old, why shouldn't they have the choice to become strippers" is the same argument that doesn't question why, 1) Men aren't making these "choices" in droves, and 2) Why women aren't offered access to college without having to get naked for predatory men.

Tyler continued the conversation on Twitter, after the show aired:

Screen Shot 2015-06-11 at 9.04.09 PM Screen Shot 2015-06-11 at 9.02.32 PMScreen Shot 2015-06-11 at 9.02.42 PMScreen Shot 2015-06-11 at 9.02.51 PMScreen Shot 2015-06-11 at 9.03.13 PMScreen Shot 2015-06-11 at 9.03.23 PM

In one tweet she says, "As a feminist, I refuse to slutshame, as tempting and enjoyable as it may be." I'm not sure what this was in response to, because no one was shaming women who work in strip clubs, nor do feminists call other women "sluts." Rather, it is men who label women "sluts" and enjoy degrading them. That's why they go to strip clubs, abuse prostituted women, and watch porn that degrades women and sexualizes male violence and rape. It is a neoliberal manipulation to call the women who fight against misogynist terms like "slut" and who challenge men who enjoy degrading women, "slutshamers." It also conveniently avoids addressing the real problem.

But I wonder what would happen if men used all their agency to make the choice not to open and/or frequent strip clubs and pay for sex and, instead, advocated for free post-secondary tuition, union wages (and supported the labour movement, more generally), affordable housing, a viable welfare system, and affordable health care instead?

Only in a world where men don’t choose to sexualize and objectify women and where women have real, viable choices, in terms of their survival, can we talk about "agency." Until then, yeah, I guess I'm "judging."

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.