rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Justin Trudeau's ethical problem

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

Photo: Adam Scotti/Justin Trudeau/Flickr

Quickly now: What do the following have in common? No Googling necessary.

-  London Health Sciences Centre ($20,000)

-  Ontario Library Association ($10,000)

-  The Learning Partnership ($10,000)

-  Waterloo Catholic District School Board ($15,000)

-  Ontario Public Service Employees Union ($20,000)

-  Charity of Hope, Hamilton ($15,000)

-  Algonquin and Lakeshore Catholic District School Board ($15,000)

-  Kincardine District Secondary School ($10,000)

-  Queen's University ($12,000)

-  Literacy for Life, Saskatoon ($20,000)

-  Canadian Mental Health Association, Halton region ($20,000)

-  Grace Foundation, St. John ($20,000)

First, they are all not-for-profit organizations.

Second, they never have as much money as they'd like.

Third, they are presumably meticulous with their expenditures.

Fourth, their budgets depend on governments, private charity or hard-pressed members.

Fifth, they all paid a huge fee -- from $10,000 to $20,000, as shown in the brackets -- to a sitting Member of Parliament to speak to them.

Sixth, that MP was Justin Trudeau.

I'm not sure what's more outrageous: that these organizations shelled out very big bucks to have an MP address them -- and if I were involved in any of them I'd want heads to roll -- or that this MP didn't have the good sense or ethical sensibility to decline.

On the contrary, since becoming a Member in 2008, Mr. Trudeau has raked in $277,000 in speaking fees from 17 speeches.

Let me try to be fair here. We wouldn't know any of this if Mr. Trudeau hadn't voluntarily disclosed to the Ottawa Citizen a great deal of personal financial information. This included not only his speaker's fees but also his inheritance from his father, worth about $1.2 million in 2012. Kudos to him.

As well, his speaking gigs were, to my surprise, approved by the Parliamentary Ethics Commissioner, Mary Dawson. Still, it left the decision to his own judgment, which is precisely the issue here.

Mr. Trudeau seems to have been a remarkably successful professional speaker before being elected, in one year pulling in fully $462,000. Good for him. As a private citizen he was entitled to squeeze what he could from organizations that invited him to speak, though some of us on the speakers' circuit have always been reluctant to take fees from community or charitable groups. Again, it's a question of judgment.

That MPs must not charge a red cent to speak to charities and not-for-profits should go without saying, though obviously it does need saying. What about private companies? Since becoming an MP, Mr. Trudeau has also been paid handsomely to speak to several of them. Businesses are of course free to use their funds as they choose. Still, morality is surely on the side of NDP MP Pat Martin who insists that "It is absolutely untoward and inappropriate for MPs or senators to charge a speaker's fee. I'm paid handsomely to be a Member of Parliament and if I'm invited to speak … that's one of my duties to share that with civil society, free of charge, gratis."

That handsome MP's reward includes a $157,731 annual salary plus $25,850 in accommodation expenses plus 64 round-trip plane trips. At a time when fewer and fewer Canadians make a secure, livable wage or get any benefits and pension at all, this must seem like winning the lottery. But for MPs outside the cabinet, it's just the beginning. Yet speaking to a school board, university or hospital means being paid a second time from the public purse, a clear case of double-dipping by any standard.

Yet Mr. Trudeau accepted such engagements from the time he was elected until the time he decided to run for party leader. It's hard to understand how someone on an MP's salary, who also happens to be worth more than a million dollars, can rationalize taking large speakers' fees.

Mr. Trudeau does himself no favours when he claims that when he speaks at such events, he doesn't talk politics. What else does a Member of Parliament do? He explained to the Ottawa Citizen that his topics include youth issues, education and the environment. Was this a joke?

It's quite something to assert with a straight face that these are not political issues. If you happened to be your party's parliamentary critic for youth, can you even open your mouth on "youth issues" without being political? And if you are that critic, are you conceivably allowed to charge school boards or promoters of learning when you address them? Isn't that what the critic's duties are all about? Isn't that what an MP gets paid to do?

Coming on top of his decision to skip a crucial vote on AIDS drugs for Africa, these revelations make you wonder about Mr. Trudeau's disabled moral compass. Does he know right from wrong?

Of course I wouldn't for a moment want the tawdry revelations about our imploding Senate to cease. For example, the Duff -- as Senator Mike Duffy adoringly calls himself -- also offers himself as a speaker, his website declaring that he's "much sought-after as a keynote speaker for charity." No doubt. But his fee is not mentioned. We can confidently expect many more headline-making revelations to come from the Senate mausoleum.

But Justin Trudeau wants to be Prime Minister of Canada. He deserves the intense scrutiny that comes with such a heady ambition, and he already has much to answer for.

This article was first published in the Globe and Mail.

Photo: Adam Scotti/Justin Trudeau/Flickr

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.