rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

If the NDP is Ottawa's 'true' opposition, now would be a good time for it to show up

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

rabble is expanding our Parliamentary Bureau and we need your help! Support us on Patreon today! 

Keep Karl on Parl

Election day was exactly seven weeks ago, and much has changed that needed changing. The Dark Ages have been ceremoniously expelled while the Canadian Spring seems to have been ushered in.

A strong majority of the Canadian people have demonstrated that the Harper government failed in its attempt to change the country's values. Smaller communities, for one shining example, are now demanding that they too get at least a few refugees to resettle, while polls show most Canadians support serious action to combat global warming. That's the decent, sensible Canada that rules once again.

Then there are our opposition political parties. The Trudeau honeymoon has already begun to wilt with Nannygate. Now, as Parliament briefly reconvenes, we need to see who will offer the most cogent opposition.

Logically it should be the NDP; it is, after all, the almost permanent Canadian gold medal holder for opposition. But hold on. Where is the NDP anyway? The NDP seems to be MIA. It's been disappeared. I'm no longer even inundated by those mind-numbing e-mails that threatened to ruin the election for me.

Partly it was stolen by Trudeau Liberals. I don't just mean progressive voters, old and new, who voted Liberal on Oct. 19. Every New Democrat I know wonders why all those stellar new cabinet ministers with wonderful credentials ran for the Liberals, not the NDP. It's deeply disconcerting. It can't be a happy sign for the NDP.

These new ministers reflect very positively on their leader, which reminds me: Whatever happened to the NDP leader? Sightings have been sporadically noted, so he's still among us. But what's he doing to determine why his party was so unexpectedly and roundly trounced on Oct. 19? A perfunctory announcement of two insiders conducting a postmortem came and went. Just as well. Having people who ran the campaign now dissect it is the worst possible step he could take.

So is he actually doing something? Is it a secret? What was his own role and that of his advisers in having orange crushed? The party demands credible answers to these central questions.

Does he want to remain leader? Apparently so. But why? Do party stalwarts want him? Who knows. The whole party has PESD -- Post-Election Stress Disorder. The defeat has largely silenced it at every level. It's shaken, but not stirred. But surely this eerie situation can't long continue. The country needs a thriving NDP, but Canadians must be reminded why. So do the stalwarts.

As for the new Official Opposition, these Conservatives have learned a little something from their defeat. But very little, and not nearly enough. No one, but no one, can have missed the huge sigh of relief emanating from le tout Canada after the election. This, strangely, even included media that had just endorsed the Harper government. Even they felt liberated, as if a dark cloud had been lifted and the cramped, mean Harper years came to an abrupt end.

Conservatives have it right that their tone had been all wrong, egregiously wrong. But they're sorely mistaken if they think their low, dishonest years can now simply be forgotten, and that merely acting less disrespectfully will soon lead to their redemption. That can't and won't happen. Their appalling record mustn't soon be forgotten or papered over. We have the right to know what role their prospective new leaders played in establishing this record.

Not least reprehensible among their sins was the secret revealed only after the election. In their final days in office, the Harper cabinet made 49 "future appointments" to government boards and agencies that would kick in even if the party were defeated. It was a way to maintain influence in key sectors. This was a quintessential Conservative move, both sneaky and undemocratic -- an attempt to tie the hands of its successor government. Did acting Conservative leader Rona Ambrose approve such duplicity? Did a single one of the aspirants to the party's leadership oppose it? Do they expect not to be asked, and judged accordingly?

Can Tony Clement get away with merely agreeing he made a mistake in eliminating the long-form census without explaining why he did so? Did any leadership candidate oppose this decision, or any other government wickedness? Was it all The Boss's fault? Did anyone ever stand up to him? And if not, what does it say about their character?

Ambition did make cowards of them all. Peter MacKay, Jason Kenney, Chris Alexander, all nonchalantly smeared critics who embarrassed or simply disagreed with the government. Should we now just forgive and forget? Does the ambitious Kellie Leitch think she won't be asked about her central role in proposing that racist and bigoted "Barbaric Cultural Practices" hotline? What kind of person must she really be?

The Conservatives' deplorable record must not be forgotten or excused quickly. They must be seen to be in purgatory and must earn the right to criticize others. One electoral defeat doesn't nearly make amends for a decade of rubbishing the Canadian dream.

As for the NDP, to be the real opposition, as it's always claimed, first they must be seen.

rabble is expanding our Parliamentary Bureau and we need your help! Support us on Patreon today! 

Keep Karl on Parl

This article originally appeared in The Globe and Mail.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.