rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Wente wrong on wind

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $1 per month!

I like absurdist comedies as much as the next person; but I usually avoid Margaret Wente’s columns. This week, though, she wrote an anti-wind turbine article and its foul wind blew my way. The article essentially says wind power is a bad idea because it provides intermittent power, can’t provide all the power that is needed and that wind turbines depend on the public purse (“that soft whooshing sound you hear is your friendly green government, vacuuming money out of your pockets.”)

Let's start with the last point, as it is the most laughable. Wente is concerned that an energy provision project uses tax dollars? As opposed to the free ride we get with any other energy project like, say, nuclear power plants? Take a look at your hydro bill and note that “debt retirement charge” next time you think nuclear doesn’t cost you big. Or read the report by Greenpeace on how nuclear plants can run 300 per cent over budget.

Greenpeace too green for you? Try this article from the Calgary Herald, “Huge Cost Overruns Mark Nuclear Industry.” Some of this is public and some of this is private building costs, but it always costs taxes, plenty of subsidies to go around and somehow they just grow and grow with those nuclear plants. Talk about a green thumb. Hell, with nuclear power plants you have to establish a no-fly zone and protect against terrorism – that’s on your government tab and, last time I checked, not a problem with the old wind farm.

That alternative energy like wind is somehow unique in taking tax money is the kind of bizarre claim the Republicans make every now and then about the American train system – Amtrak. Why should the government subsidize it, they ask, if Amtrak can’t compete? Compete like who? The auto makers don’t build the roads, or clean them, or enforce the laws on them (but they still need a bit of help, eh?), and I haven’t been to any airport that didn’t cost some big tax bucks. Public infrastructure costs public money.

And in that light, news flash, energy costs money. What's more, the government should be investing in energy infrastructure, clean(er) energy, especially emerging technologies. Yes, wind is an intermittent power, as is solar, but the whole point is that we need to establish distributed energy supply systems (many different sources of energy from all over – micro to macro) drawing on different sources which will make the energy grid more reliable in the long run. And more work is needed for energy storage.

“But they cost more”! Well, a more complete cost accounting would look at things like construction, security, disposal (what’s the bill for protecting nuclear waste for thousands of years?) as well as the costs of the production/extraction (oops, oil sands cost might be over 35 per cent more) and even the economic costs of using the energy (such as the affects of poor air quality on health care). Of course an even more complete cost would look at the environmental toll of a particular technology on the whole ecosystem.

These investments and incentives - the government subsidies that Wente decries for wind power in places like Germany - have helped to create over 250,000 green jobs there and large numbers elsewhere.

Despite the evidence, Wente's comedy of errors on green energy is sadly still too prevelant (but check out this article on those very myths.)

So, no, Ms. Wente, the biggest problem with wind isn’t “that it doesn’t always blow.” But your argument does.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.