rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Jian Ghomeshi's public relations disaster

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca for as little as $5 per month!

If Jian Ghomeshi was still on the air, he'd be all over this story.

That's what Q did best. It explored the intersections of interesting and emerging cultural trends. Like why a star has to lose his job because of what he does in his private life. Like what are the limits of consent in sexual relationships. Like when pandering to your friends on Facebook can help you and when it can be absolutely disastrous.

As someone who charmed us with his quick intelligence on radio, Ghomeshi (so far at least) seems to be the clueless author of his own downfall in real life.

Imagine if he had said nothing at all. That's what the CBC, at least initially, offered to do for him. He could take an indefinite leave from the show he helped create, for reasons unexplained. Just go to the sidelines for a while and let us all think, who knows, he must be dealing with the recent death of his beloved father.

Instead -- and it can only be hubris -- he chose to go on the offence. In a remarkable 1,600-word Facebook exercise in TMI, Ghomeshi tried to paint himself as a victim of a vindictive "jilted ex-girlfriend," gave details of his preference for BDSM sex and claimed it was always consensual, attacked his employer for prudishness and cowardice, and said he was launching a $55 million lawsuit for defamation and breach of trust.

Initially, it seemed to work. His fans sent messages of support -- including one, remarkably, from Green Party leader Elizabeth May, who quickly had to backtrack when the other side of the story -- involving the physical abuse of women -- emerged.

And that emerged because of Ghomeshi's decision to go public. The Toronto Star, which had spent months investigating four women's complaints about his sexual violence, was holding its story in abeyance because, editor Michael Cooke explained, there was no proof. It's not clear if it would ever have published it. But that changed when Ghomeshi went public with his side of the case. Said Cooke in an editor's note accompanying yesterday's story: "In view of Mr. Ghomeshi’s extraordinary statement on Facebook on Sunday evening, and his high public profile in Canada, we now believe it is in the public interest to detail those allegations, which appear to have led directly to his sudden firing from the CBC."

Now we had evidence that four women claimed to have suffered non-consensual abuse. Suddenly the supportive messages on Ghomeshi's Facebook page included ones like this: "Jian I think you're lying." And this: "Sexual abuse is a terrible thing, I will wait for more concrete evidence before making a decision, but not much respect left for Jian."

So why did he decide to argue his case in the open court of Facebook?

One answer may be Navigator. Ghomeshi hired the high-stakes, high-priced reputation management company which specializes in helping public figures under attack. One of its tactics is to use social media to get out in front of the story.

If Navigator approved or helped craft Ghomeshi's Facebook piece, it made a colossal mistake. It flushed out the Star story and led to a furious and very open debate about Ghomeshi's character, the good, the bad and the ugly. At the end of Monday, his public image was considerably worse than when the day began.

If Ghomeshi did it on his own, Navigator should cut him loose as a hopeless client who went rogue.

We can all lament the demise of a charismatic radio interviewer who defined our popular culture in incisive ways. But we will not learn any lessons in damage control from Jian Ghomeshi or Navigator. This is a textbook example of how not to do it.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.