rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

CBC's secret fund story still stands despite belated Conservative denials

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca today for as little as $1 per month!

Please support our coverage of democratic movements and become a supporting member of rabble.ca.

Sometimes strong wording and firm denials don't add up to much.

Take the Conservative Party's official, if belated, reaction to Greg Weston's CBC story about the secret Conservative Party "slush fund" controlled by the Prime Minister's Chief of Staff.

When CBC first contacted Party officials, while preparing the story, the officials did not deny the story. They only said that recourse to such a fund was normal operating procedure, a way of assuring that taxpayers didn't foot the bill for the Prime Minister’s partisan activities.

Then, many hours after the story appeared on air and online, the Party's chief spokesperson, Fred Delorey, issued a news release saying the CBC story was "false" and accusing the CBC of "shoddy journalism."

Parliamentary Secretary Pierre Poilievre echoed that position in Question Period on Friday.

Delorey's news release says: "All Conservative Party expenses are paid by one account, controlled by the Conservative Party. All funds are properly reported to Elections Canada and audited annually."

But the Conservatives did not say that when originally contacted by CBC.

They merely argued that it was normal and appropriate for the Party to pay for partisan activities, not the government.

Conservative MP Chris Alexander answered questions on this subject after Question Period on Friday, and his version does not seem to correspond to Delorey's and Poilievre's.

Here's how that question and answer went. The exchange is entirely in French.

Chris Alexander: Non, c'est le Parti conservateur qui finance les activités partisanes.

Question: Mais c'est pas le fonds —

Chris Alexander: Le chef du Parti conservateur, même chose pour les autres partis.

Question: Le fonds dans le Bureau du Premier ministre qui est géré par le chef de cabinet.

Chris Alexander : Le Premier ministre travaille dans son bureau. Il est au même temps chef de son parti. Qu'est-ce qu'il y a à ne pas comprendre là-dedans?

Question: L'argent que le Parti conservateur donne pour les dépenses partisanes de M. Harper il est bel et bien partie d'un budget au Bureau du Premier ministre, est géré par le chef de cabinet du Premier ministre et non par le parti?

Chris Alexander: Ça fait partie des fonds du Parti conservateur.

Question: Oui, mais qui est-ce qui gère cet argent-là dans le bureau de M. Harper? Qui le gère? Qui l'administre?

Chris Alexander: Mais Nigel Wright avait rapport avec l'horaire du Premier ministre donc lorsqu'il y avait une activité partisane, il avait recours à ce fonds.
Question: Donc c'est le chef de cabinet qui gère cet argent-là. Le chef de cabinet du Premier ministre. C'est pas le chef de cabinet du Parti conservateur.

Chris Alexander: Il faut demander au Bureau du Premier ministre comment il organise le fonds. Merci.

The key parts of this exchange are the last three questions and answers.

The reporter asks Alexander if the money the Party gives the Prime Minister for partisan work is managed by the Prime Minister's Chief of Staff or by the Party Headquarters.

Alexander answers that the money is part of Conservative Party funds.

The reporter then says, yes, but who has managed that money in the Prime Minister's office?

Alexander replies that Nigel Wright knew the Prime Minister's schedule, thus, when there were partisan activities Wright had access to funds required for that purpose.

Finally the reporter pushed further, asking if it was not, indeed, the Prime Minister's Chief of Staff who controlled these funds, rather than someone in the Party office.

Alexander's reply was very careful. You will have to ask the Prime Minister's office how they organize the fund, he said.

From here it does not look like CBC has anything to retract. 

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.