rabble blogs are the personal pages of some of Canada's most insightful progressive activists and commentators. All opinions belong to the writer; however, writers are expected to adhere to our guidelines. We welcome new bloggers -- contact us for details.

Nunavut gets to participate in the 'guns versus butter' debate

Please chip in to support more articles like this. Support rabble.ca in its summer fundraiser today for as little as $5 per month!

Everyone should know by now that Nunavut has enough social problems to make your head spin.

For graphic descriptions of this the Globe and Mail has recently been running a series of articles that lays bare all.

Suicide rates are off the charts, substance abuse problems are fragmenting communities and there is a housing shortage that makes one wonder if Nunavut is part of this continent, let alone Canada.

But let us not forget that like any other riding in Canada there are a multitude of other issues that have to be addressed.

To their credit the local candidates for the federal election have been raising some of this 'multitude' in their campaigns.

Who are the candidates, you might ask?  

Airline employee Scott MacCallum of the Greens, Conservative incumbent Leona Aglukkaq and up until the election call Harper's health minister, former Nunavut premier Paul Okalik of the Liberals and northern researcher Jack Hicks of the NDP are all vying for the chance to represent Nunavut in the Canadian House of Commons.

As in all the northern ridings mining, despite the fact most of it is a territorial responsibility, has become a campaign issue.

There are some pretty whacky mineral extraction ideas floating around Nunavut these days and given the current high prices of commodities some of these projects might actually go ahead.

To its credit, the territorial government has been travelling to the various communities to discuss the risks of uranium mining, and it would appear the feds are more than happy to hand this contentious consultation over to them.

One aspect of mining that will be negative, apart from the environmental impacts, is that these grandiose and large-scale projects will literally change the face of Nunavut.

For example, the Baffinland Mine proposal would cost billions and possibly involve construction of a railway and a deepwater ocean port in a territory that cannot even staff its own territorial bureaucracy.

That means there's going to be a flood of outsiders coming in to work, administer and regulate such a mine.  

There is the very good possibility the Inuvialiut will become strangers in their own land, until such time as commodity prices go down again or the ore bodies run out.

A more immediate campaign issue, one that is being noticed in every kitchen, is the Nutrition North program changes.

When food is shipped to remote northern communities the federal government provides a subsidy to ensure food costs don't get too high.

Recent changes to the Nutrition North program brought in by the Harper government have not been popular.

Candidates are no doubt finding out that it's one thing to have a political discussion about buying new fighter jets, it's quite another to have a voter noticing that certain food prices are going through the roof.

The Harper government is about to learn that people are more likely to vote against them because their grocery bills are now higher due to government policies, than vote for incredibly expensive military hardware that will have little to no local impact.

Or to put it simply, when given a choice most people vote for butter over guns despite what the military-industrial complex would have us do.

A very local issue is Canada's ban on international exports of polar bear hides and narwhal tusks.

The smaller communities in Nunavut do not have very many economic opportunities and sometimes guiding rich southern hunters on a bear hunt, or harvesting whale ivory for artistic use and then sale overseas is literally the only economic game in town.

Southern Canadians, especially those of an environmental bent, might be aghast at the concept of bear and whale harvesting.

In the North, it is part of a traditional way of life and is inter-connected to a cultural and social value system that non-Nunavummiut will probably never understand.

But the big issue, the one the Globe and Mail actually got right, is the need to address social issues.

Despite having the federal health minister as the incumbent Member of Parliament, the social problems defy belief.

It should be interesting to see what all the parties promise in addressing this.

Because there have been a lot of promises in the past, and things don't seem to have changed.

Thank you for reading this story…

More people are reading rabble.ca than ever and unlike many news organizations, we have never put up a paywall – at rabble we’ve always believed in making our reporting and analysis free to all, while striving to make it sustainable as well. Media isn’t free to produce. rabble’s total budget is likely less than what big corporate media spend on photocopying (we kid you not!) and we do not have any major foundation, sponsor or angel investor. Our main supporters are people and organizations -- like you. This is why we need your help. You are what keep us sustainable.

rabble.ca has staked its existence on you. We live or die on community support -- your support! We get hundreds of thousands of visitors and we believe in them. We believe in you. We believe people will put in what they can for the greater good. We call that sustainable.

So what is the easy answer for us? Depend on a community of visitors who care passionately about media that amplifies the voices of people struggling for change and justice. It really is that simple. When the people who visit rabble care enough to contribute a bit then it works for everyone.

And so we’re asking you if you could make a donation, right now, to help us carry forward on our mission. Make a donation today.


We welcome your comments! rabble.ca embraces a pro-human rights, pro-feminist, anti-racist, queer-positive, anti-imperialist and pro-labour stance, and encourages discussions which develop progressive thought. Our full comment policy can be found here. Learn more about Disqus on rabble.ca and your privacy here. Please keep in mind:


  • Tell the truth and avoid rumours.
  • Add context and background.
  • Report typos and logical fallacies.
  • Be respectful.
  • Respect copyright - link to articles.
  • Stay focused. Bring in-depth commentary to our discussion forum, babble.


  • Use oppressive/offensive language.
  • Libel or defame.
  • Bully or troll.
  • Post spam.
  • Engage trolls. Flag suspect activity instead.